H.R. 9273

H.R. 9273: To direct the Secretary of Health and Human Services to require public institutions of higher education that receive grants under the Medical Student Education program to include training for medical students relating to menopause in the curri

Introduced Valerie Foushee (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9273 is a bill that aims to mandate public colleges and universities, which receive funding from the Medical Student Education program, to incorporate training on menopause into their medical curriculum. This is intended to ensure that future healthcare providers are better equipped to understand and address menopause-related health issues in their patients.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9273 have praised the bill for recognizing the importance of menopause education in medical training. They argue that this initiative will help improve women's health care by ensuring that medical students are knowledgeable about menopause and can provide better support and treatment options for women experiencing this natural life transition.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9273 have raised concerns about the potential for additional mandates on medical education, arguing that it could lead to a one-size-fits-all approach in training that may not address the diverse needs of all medical students. Some detractors also worry about the allocation of resources and whether this requirement could detract from other essential areas of medical training.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of H.R. 9273, which focuses on requiring training for medical students on menopause, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Valerie Foushee's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The lobbying activity in the healthcare policy area does not indicate significant financial influence from donors related to the bill's focus on menopause education. The highest lobbying amounts come from industries such as chemicals and technology, which do not have a direct connection to medical education or menopause. This suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest, as the financial interests of the sponsor's donors do not appear to directly influence the legislative intent of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC $260,000
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL FKA MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION ZIEBART CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ORGANIC PRODUCE ASSOCIATION THE RUSSELL GROUP, INC. $50,000
GRAVITICS TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL INC VENABLE LLP $30,000
CITY OF WILLISTON (ND) NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS $28,000
S&P GLOBAL F/K/A IHS MARITIME & TRADE VENABLE LLP $20,000
TOWN OF TUSAYAN NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE $5,000
NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRIES, INC. VENABLE LLP undisclosed
ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
US CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed
CX2 ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Valerie Foushee, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us