H.R. 9274

H.R. 9274: To direct the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to establish a gun violence prevention and public safety database.

Introduced Valerie Foushee (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9274 aims to require the Director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to create a database focused on gun violence prevention and public safety. This database is intended to collect and analyze data related to gun violence incidents to inform public health strategies and policies.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9274 have praised the bill for its potential to enhance public safety through data-driven approaches. They argue that establishing a comprehensive database will help identify trends in gun violence, leading to more effective prevention strategies and improved community safety.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9274 have expressed concerns that the bill could lead to increased government surveillance and infringe on Second Amendment rights. Some opponents argue that the establishment of a gun violence database may be seen as a step toward gun control measures, which they believe could further polarize the debate on gun rights in the U.S.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Health

The analysis of H.R. 9274, which aims to establish a gun violence prevention and public safety database, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Valerie Foushee's top donor industries. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in gun violence prevention, suggesting that there is minimal risk of conflicts of interest arising from financial contributions. The lobbying activity related to this policy area includes various organizations, but none are directly linked to gun violence or public safety, further supporting the low risk assessment. The total lobbying amounts from these organizations do not indicate a concentrated effort to influence this specific legislation, as they represent a diverse range of interests.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC $260,000
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL FKA MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION ZIEBART CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ORGANIC PRODUCE ASSOCIATION THE RUSSELL GROUP, INC. $50,000
GRAVITICS TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL INC VENABLE LLP $30,000
CITY OF WILLISTON (ND) NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS $28,000
S&P GLOBAL F/K/A IHS MARITIME & TRADE VENABLE LLP $20,000
TOWN OF TUSAYAN NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE $5,000
NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRIES, INC. VENABLE LLP undisclosed
ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
US CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed
CX2 ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us