H.R. 9275

H.R. 9275: To amend the Truth in Lending Act to include buy now, pay later loans and issuers of such loans in the definition of credit card and credit issuer, respectively, and for other purposes.

Introduced Dan Goldman (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9275 aims to amend the Truth in Lending Act to classify 'buy now, pay later' (BNPL) loans as credit cards and the companies that offer these loans as credit issuers. This change would require BNPL lenders to adhere to the same disclosure and regulatory standards that apply to traditional credit card issuers, potentially increasing transparency for consumers regarding the terms and costs associated with these loans.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9275 argue that the bill will enhance consumer protection by ensuring that buy now, pay later loans are subject to the same scrutiny and transparency requirements as credit cards. Advocates believe this will help consumers make more informed financial decisions and prevent them from falling into debt traps associated with unclear loan terms.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9275 express concern that the bill could stifle innovation in the BNPL sector by imposing burdensome regulations on providers. They argue that this could lead to reduced access to flexible payment options for consumers, particularly those who rely on BNPL services for budgeting and managing expenses.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9275, which seeks to amend the Truth in Lending Act to include buy now, pay later loans, shows no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Dan Goldman's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in the regulation of buy now, pay later loans, which suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area from various organizations, the amounts disclosed are not directly tied to the sponsor's financial backers, further minimizing potential conflicts. For instance, Monroe Energy, LLC and Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc. have contributed $10,000 each, but their interests do not align with the credit lending focus of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Dan Goldman, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us