H.R. 9282

H.R. 9282: To amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to provide that entrance fees shall not be charged for entry to Federal recreational lands and water on certain days, and for other purposes.

Introduced Sydney Kamlager-Dove (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9282 aims to amend the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to eliminate entrance fees for certain days at federal recreational lands and waters. This bill is likely intended to increase public access to these areas by allowing free entry on designated days, promoting outdoor activities and recreation.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9282 have praised the bill for enhancing public access to national parks and recreational areas, arguing that it encourages outdoor activities and helps families enjoy nature without the burden of fees. Many see it as a step towards making federal lands more inclusive and accessible to all Americans.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9282 express concerns that waiving entrance fees could lead to decreased funding for maintenance and conservation of federal recreational lands. Some argue that while the intent to increase access is commendable, the potential financial impact on park services and infrastructure could be detrimental in the long run.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

The analysis of H.R. 9282 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Sydney Kamlager-Dove's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, which seeks to eliminate entrance fees for federal recreational lands on certain days. While there is significant lobbying activity from companies such as Tencent America LLC and Alibaba Group Holding Limited, their interests do not appear to directly align with the provisions of the bill. The total lobbying amounts from these companies are substantial, with Tencent America contributing $200,000 and Alibaba contributing $80,000, but they are not specifically tied to the recreation or federal lands sector. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest is assessed as low, as the financial influence does not directly impact the legislative intent of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA, LLC BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $200,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $80,000
B&H FOTO & ELECTRONICS CORP STONINGTON GLOBAL $75,000
CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. $60,000
NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC $10,000
SULLIVAN STRATEGIES OBO ODOT COLUMBIA STRATEGIC COUNSEL $10,000
ACT FOR AMERICA ACT FOR AMERICA $10,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
XTAR LLC THE MADISON GROUP undisclosed
ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK undisclosed
ARDMORE CONSULTING GROUP, INC BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP undisclosed
T-MOBILE USA, INC. ALPINE ADVISORS undisclosed
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. undisclosed
PLAYPOWER, INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Sydney Kamlager-Dove, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us