H.R. 9283

H.R. 9283: To require a review of acquisitions by investment companies involving acquisition of controlling interest of major defense suppliers, and for other purposes.

Introduced Ro Khanna (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9283 aims to mandate a review process for investment companies that seek to acquire a controlling interest in major defense suppliers. This is likely intended to ensure that such acquisitions do not compromise national security or the integrity of the defense supply chain.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9283 have praised the bill for its proactive approach to safeguarding national security. They argue that by reviewing acquisitions of major defense suppliers, the legislation helps to prevent foreign influence and maintain the integrity of critical defense operations.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9283 have raised concerns that the bill could create unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles for investment companies, potentially stifling innovation and investment in the defense sector. Some argue that the review process may lead to delays in acquisitions that could benefit national security.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9283 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Ro Khanna's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter, which focuses on acquisitions by investment companies involving major defense suppliers. Although there is lobbying activity in this policy area, the disclosed amounts do not indicate a significant financial influence from the sponsors' donors directly related to defense acquisitions. The largest lobbying contributions come from Shanda Asset Management LLC ($50,000) and the Spray Foam Coalition ($60,000), neither of which has a clear connection to defense suppliers. This lack of direct financial ties suggests a low risk of conflict of interest, as the bill does not appear to benefit any specific donor or industry significantly.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed
CURIUM US LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
TWINZA OIL LIMITED ANCHOR GROUP LLC undisclosed
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
PELICAN ENERGY PARTNERS LP CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
CORVUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Ro Khanna, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us