H.R. 9286

H.R. 9286: To direct the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to conduct a study and submit to Congress a report on the technologies used to provide broadband internet access service, and for other purposes.

Introduced April McClain Delaney (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9286 directs the Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Communications and Information to conduct a study on the technologies used to provide broadband internet access. The bill aims to gather information and insights that will be compiled into a report for Congress, potentially to inform future legislation or policy decisions regarding broadband access.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9286 have praised the bill as a necessary step towards understanding the current landscape of broadband technology. They argue that the study will help identify gaps in service and inform strategies to improve internet access, especially in underserved areas, thereby promoting digital equity.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9286 have expressed concerns that the bill may lead to unnecessary bureaucracy and delay in addressing urgent broadband access issues. Some argue that instead of conducting a study, immediate actions should be taken to expand broadband infrastructure and access, especially in rural and low-income communities.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Science, Technology, Communications

The analysis of H.R. 9286 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter, which focuses on broadband internet access. While there are several lobbying activities in the broadband sector, the contributions from these entities do not indicate a direct financial influence on the bill's objectives. Notably, BYD Motors, LLC and Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd. have contributed $20,000 and $90,000 respectively, but these amounts do not suggest a significant risk of conflict given the absence of direct ties to the bill's intent. Voters should be aware that while there are lobbyists involved, the lack of direct donor overlap with the bill's subject indicates a lower risk of conflicts of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WINEGRAPE GROWERS TORREY ADVISORY GROUP (FORMERLY MICHAEL TORREY ASSOCIATES, LLC) $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed
MBDA INCORPORATED MBDA INCORPORATED undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding April McClain Delaney, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us