H.R. 9290

H.R. 9290: To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide for the allotment of Supreme Court justices to circuits, and for other purposes.

Introduced Joseph Morelle (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9290 proposes to amend Title 28 of the United States Code to establish a system for assigning Supreme Court justices to specific judicial circuits. This change aims to enhance the distribution of justices across the country and could impact how cases are heard at the circuit level.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9290 argue that the bill would promote a more equitable judicial system by ensuring that all circuits have access to Supreme Court justices, potentially leading to more consistent legal interpretations across the country. Advocates believe this could improve the efficiency of the judicial process and enhance public trust in the legal system.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9290 express concerns that the bill could politicize the assignment of justices to circuits, undermining the independence of the judiciary. Detractors argue that such a system might lead to unequal treatment of cases based on the political leanings of assigned justices, which could exacerbate divisions within the legal system.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The analysis of H.R. 9290, sponsored by Joseph Morelle, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The bill focuses on the allotment of Supreme Court justices to circuits, a topic that does not appear to be influenced by the financial interests of Morelle's donors. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the amounts disclosed do not indicate a direct financial interest that could create a conflict. For instance, Green Oceans contributed $22,500, Shanda Asset Management LLC contributed $50,000, and the Spray Foam Coalition contributed $60,000, but these contributions do not correlate with the judicial allotment topic of the bill. Therefore, the risk of conflict is assessed as low, as there are no clear financial incentives that could sway legislative decisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed
CURIUM US LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
TWINZA OIL LIMITED ANCHOR GROUP LLC undisclosed
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
PELICAN ENERGY PARTNERS LP CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
CORVUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Joseph Morelle, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us