H.R. 9293

H.R. 9293: To amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act to provide that solid waste shall not include certain recovered materials and recovered resources, and for other purposes.

Introduced Jay Obernolte (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9293 aims to amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act by clarifying that certain recovered materials and resources should not be classified as solid waste. This change is likely intended to promote recycling and recovery efforts by reducing regulatory burdens on materials that can be reused or repurposed.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9293 have praised the bill for its potential to enhance recycling efforts and promote sustainability. They argue that by redefining what constitutes solid waste, the bill encourages businesses and communities to invest in recovery technologies and practices, leading to a more circular economy.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9293 have raised concerns that the bill could lead to environmental risks by allowing certain materials to bypass waste management regulations. They argue that without proper oversight, the classification changes could result in increased pollution and harm to public health, as materials that should be treated as waste may not receive the necessary handling.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Environmental Protection

The analysis of H.R. 9293, sponsored by Jay Obernolte, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. Although there is significant lobbying activity in the solid waste disposal sector, the financial contributions from the listed lobbying entities do not directly relate to the bill's provisions. For instance, BYD Motors, LLC and Quectel Wireless Solutions Co., Ltd. contributed $20,000 and $90,000 respectively, but their industries do not align with solid waste management. The lack of direct financial ties suggests a low risk of conflict of interest, indicating that the sponsor's legislative actions are unlikely to be influenced by donor interests in this specific policy area.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WINEGRAPE GROWERS TORREY ADVISORY GROUP (FORMERLY MICHAEL TORREY ASSOCIATES, LLC) $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed
MBDA INCORPORATED MBDA INCORPORATED undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Jay Obernolte, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us