H.R. 9312

H.R. 9312: To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to include the processing of crawfish as agricultural labor or services, and for other purposes.

Introduced Troy Carter (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9312 aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to classify the processing of crawfish as agricultural labor or services. This change would likely facilitate the hiring of foreign workers in the crawfish processing industry, recognizing it as an essential agricultural activity.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9312 argue that this bill is a necessary step to support the crawfish industry, which is crucial for the economy in certain regions, particularly in the South. They highlight that by officially recognizing crawfish processing as agricultural labor, it will help address labor shortages and ensure the industry's sustainability.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9312 express concerns that the bill could lead to an over-reliance on foreign labor, potentially displacing local workers. There are also worries that it might set a precedent for other industries seeking similar classifications, which could complicate immigration policy and labor market dynamics.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Immigration

The analysis of H.R. 9312, which aims to amend the Immigration and Nationality Act to include crawfish processing as agricultural labor, shows no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Troy Carter's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donors primarily represent sectors such as labor unions and independent laboratories, which do not have a direct stake in agricultural labor related to crawfish processing. The lobbying activity associated with the bill includes contributions from various organizations, with Upstate Niagara Cooperative and Agri-Mark each contributing $10,000. However, these contributions do not indicate a direct conflict as they are not primarily focused on crawfish or agricultural labor issues. Overall, the risk of conflict of interest appears low due to the lack of direct financial ties to the specific subject of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
STREET GRACE ASCEND CONSULTING $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
CHRISTIAN CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us