H.R. 9319

H.R. 9319: To amend the Animal Welfare Act to direct the Secretary of Agriculture to enter into cooperative agreements to support the microchipping of dogs and cats in the care of animal shelters or similar establishments, and for other purposes.

Introduced Ted Lieu (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9319 aims to amend the Animal Welfare Act by directing the Secretary of Agriculture to create cooperative agreements that will support the microchipping of dogs and cats in animal shelters and similar facilities. This would likely enhance the identification and reunification of lost pets with their owners, improving overall animal welfare.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have generally praised H.R. 9319 for its potential to improve animal welfare and reduce the number of lost pets. Supporters highlight that microchipping can facilitate the quick return of pets to their owners, thereby decreasing the burden on animal shelters and enhancing public safety.

Negative Media Summary

Some critics express concerns that the bill may impose additional costs on already-strained animal shelters, particularly in smaller or rural areas. There are worries that without sufficient funding and resources, the implementation of microchipping initiatives could be challenging, potentially leading to disparities in animal care.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Environmental Protection

The analysis of H.R. 9319, which focuses on microchipping dogs and cats in shelters, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Ted Lieu's top donor industries. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes significant contributions from companies like Tencent America LLC ($200,000) and Alibaba Group Holding Limited ($80,000), but these companies are not directly tied to the animal welfare sector. The presence of these companies suggests a potential indirect influence, but without a clear connection to the bill's subject matter, the risk of conflict remains low. Voters should be aware that while there is lobbying activity, it does not directly correlate with the bill's intent or the interests of the sponsor's donors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TENCENT AMERICA, LLC BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $200,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK, LLP $80,000
B&H FOTO & ELECTRONICS CORP STONINGTON GLOBAL $75,000
CTIA-THE WIRELESS ASSOCIATION MINTZ LEVIN COHN FERRIS GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C. $60,000
NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC NORTH AMERICAN RESCUE, LLC $10,000
SULLIVAN STRATEGIES OBO ODOT COLUMBIA STRATEGIC COUNSEL $10,000
ACT FOR AMERICA ACT FOR AMERICA $10,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
XTAR LLC THE MADISON GROUP undisclosed
ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK ALLERGY & ASTHMA NETWORK undisclosed
ARDMORE CONSULTING GROUP, INC BRADLEY ARANT BOULT CUMMINGS LLP undisclosed
T-MOBILE USA, INC. ALPINE ADVISORS undisclosed
AXON ENTERPRISE, INC. ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. undisclosed
PLAYPOWER, INC. MILLER STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us