H.R. 9321

H.R. 9321: To temporarily expand the authorized uses of grants awarded under the Veterans Legacy Program of the National Cemetery Administration, and for other purposes.

Introduced Zachary (Zach) Nunn (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9321 aims to temporarily broaden the ways in which grants from the Veterans Legacy Program, managed by the National Cemetery Administration, can be used. This likely includes expanding funding opportunities for projects that honor veterans and preserve their legacies.

Positive Media Summary

Some media outlets have praised H.R. 9321 for its potential to enhance the recognition of veterans and support projects that contribute to their memorialization and legacy, emphasizing the importance of honoring those who served in the military.

Negative Media Summary

Critics have expressed concern that expanding the authorized uses of these grants may lead to misallocation of funds or lack of oversight, potentially diverting resources from more pressing needs within the veterans' community.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9321, sponsored by Zachary Nunn, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill focuses on expanding the authorized uses of grants under the Veterans Legacy Program, which primarily serves veterans and their families. The lobbying activity in this area includes various organizations, but none appear to have a direct financial interest in the specific provisions of the bill. The largest contributions from lobbying entities, such as the American Subcontractor Association ($30,000) and American Council of Independent Laboratories ($20,000), do not directly relate to veterans' services or cemetery administration, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while there is lobbying activity, the lack of direct ties to the bill's subject suggests minimal risk of undue influence.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
STREET GRACE ASCEND CONSULTING $30,000
FCA INTERNATIONAL OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $25,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
3STRANDS GLOBAL FOUNDATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
CHRISTIAN CAMP AND CONFERENCE ASSOCIATION ASCEND CONSULTING $10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCATION OF DRILLING CONTRACTORS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Zachary (Zach) Nunn, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $200,000,000
Individuals: $200,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $62,500,000
Individuals: $62,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us