H.R. 9325

H.R. 9325: To establish the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area to conserve, protect, and promote the economic benefits of the natural, cultural, and recreational resources of the Upper and Middle Texas Gulf Coast as a unit of the National Park Sy

Introduced Randy Weber (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9325 aims to create the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area in Texas, focusing on the conservation and protection of the natural, cultural, and recreational resources in the Upper and Middle Texas Gulf Coast. The bill seeks to promote the economic benefits associated with these resources by designating the area as part of the National Park System.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9325 have praised the bill for its potential to enhance environmental conservation efforts and promote tourism in the Texas Gulf Coast region. They highlight the importance of preserving natural habitats and cultural landmarks, which could lead to increased economic opportunities for local communities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9325 express concerns about the implications of federal control over land use and the potential restrictions on local development. Some argue that the designation could limit economic growth opportunities and impose additional regulations on landowners and businesses in the area.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
4/10
Risk Level
Medium
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Public Lands and Natural Resources

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries, the lobbying activity related to the bill raises some concerns. The National Motor Freight Traffic Association, which contributed $22,500, and Stevens Trucking, which contributed $30,000, are both involved in the freight and transportation sectors. These industries could potentially benefit from infrastructure or economic policies that may arise from the establishment of the Lone Star Coastal National Recreation Area. Additionally, the Fresh Produce Association of the Americas, contributing $45,000, may have interests in how conservation efforts could impact agricultural transport and trade. Although these connections are not direct, the substantial contributions from these industries warrant attention as they could influence the bill's outcomes.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
HOGAN LOVELLS, LLP OBO ZHONGJI INNOLIGHT CO., LTD. MO STRATEGIES, INC. $530,000
TENCENT AMERICA LLC MO STRATEGIES, INC. $530,000
BORDER TRADE ALLIANCE BC CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED MO STRATEGIES, INC. $60,000
FRESH PRODUCE ASSOCIATION OF THE AMERICAS BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
WERNER ENTERPRISES BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
OLD DOMINION FREIGHT LINE, INC. BC CONSULTING, LLC $45,000
NATIONAL TANK TRUCK CARRIER, INC. BC CONSULTING, LLC $37,500
STEVENS TRUCKING BC CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
NATIONAL MOTOR FREIGHT TRAFFIC ASSOCIATION BC CONSULTING, LLC $22,500
STARR-CAMARGO BRIDGE COMPANY BC CONSULTING, LLC $15,000
STRAUNS CUSTOMHOUSE BROKERS, LLC BC CONSULTING, LLC $7,500
CLEAN FREIGHT COALITION MULLEN CONSULTING LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ASHEBORO CRANFILL SUMNER LLP undisclosed
CITY OF ASHEBORO CRANFILL SUMNER LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us