H.R. 9331

H.R. 9331: To amend the Expedited Funds Availability Act to provide exceptions in the case of fraudulent checks or wire transfers, and for other purposes.

Reported by Committee Young Kim (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9331 proposes amendments to the Expedited Funds Availability Act, allowing banks and financial institutions to delay the availability of funds when there are concerns about fraudulent checks or wire transfers. The bill aims to provide more flexibility for financial institutions in handling potential fraud cases, ensuring that they can take necessary precautions before releasing funds.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9331 have praised the bill for enhancing the security measures that banks can take against fraud. They argue that the amendments will help protect consumers and financial institutions from losses due to fraudulent activities, ultimately contributing to a safer banking environment.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9331 have raised concerns that the bill could lead to unnecessary delays in fund availability for consumers, particularly those who rely on quick access to their money. There are fears that the amendments may be exploited by banks to hold funds longer than necessary, potentially harming individuals and small businesses.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
5/10
Risk Level
Medium
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9331, there are notable lobbying activities that could indicate potential conflicts of interest. The Financial Oversight and Management Board for Puerto Rico, which has contributed $60,000 to Young Kim, is involved in financial oversight, which could intersect with the bill's amendments to the Expedited Funds Availability Act concerning fraudulent checks and wire transfers. This raises questions about whether the interests of this donor align with the legislative changes proposed. Additionally, the Queens Chamber of Commerce has contributed $10,000 and is also involved in financial matters, further complicating the landscape of potential influence. Voters should be aware of these connections as they may affect the integrity of the legislative process.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area. 1 lobbying client(s) are also sponsor donors.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
FINANCIAL OVERSIGHT AND MANAGEMENT BOARD FOR PUERTO RICO Also a Donor OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $60,000
OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY RED MAPLE CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
UNITED LAUNCH ALLIANCE RED MAPLE CONSULTING, LLC $40,000
NATIONAL MARINE SANCTUARIES FOUNDATION RED MAPLE CONSULTING, LLC $20,000
ORLANDO HEALTH ORLANDO HEALTH $20,000
FRIEDKIN GROUP DOUCET CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC $20,000
FARM CREDIT MID-AMERICA FARM CREDIT MID-AMERICA $20,000
QUEENS CHAMBER OF COMMERCE LEMMA STRATEGIES INC $10,000
WILLIAMS AND JENSEN ON BEHALF OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM DOUCET CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC $10,000
NY SUN WORKS LEMMA STRATEGIES INC $10,000
LOUISIANA SHERIFFS' ASSOCIATION DOUCET CONSULTING SOLUTIONS, LLC $10,000
DELTA AIRLINES LEMMA STRATEGIES INC undisclosed
69 BRIDGELINK APPIAN undisclosed
ALPHAPOINTE LEMMA STRATEGIES INC undisclosed
DOLLAR TREE MANAGEMENT, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Young Kim, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us