H.R. 9332

H.R. 9332: Load Forecasting Enhancement Act

Reported by Committee Troy Balderson (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Load Forecasting Enhancement Act is a proposed law that aims to improve how we predict future electricity needs. It directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to create regional groups, called joint boards, that will work with state public utility commissions. These boards will study and identify the best methods for forecasting electricity demand to ensure reliable and affordable service for customers. The findings and recommendations from these studies will be reported to Congress. Additionally, the act seeks to amend existing laws to require each state to consider these best practices in their energy planning.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the Load Forecasting Enhancement Act argue that it will lead to more accurate predictions of electricity demand, which is crucial for maintaining a stable and affordable power supply. By fostering collaboration between federal and state agencies, the act is seen as a proactive step toward modernizing the grid and preventing potential power shortages. Proponents believe that implementing best practices in load forecasting will benefit both consumers and the energy industry by promoting efficiency and reliability.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the Load Forecasting Enhancement Act express concerns about the potential for increased bureaucracy and regulatory complexity. They argue that establishing regional joint boards could lead to delays in decision-making and implementation of necessary infrastructure projects. Additionally, some worry that the act may impose additional compliance costs on utilities, which could be passed on to consumers. There is also skepticism about the effectiveness of federal oversight in addressing the unique energy needs of different states and regions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Energy

The Load Forecasting Enhancement Act, sponsored by Troy Balderson, does not present any direct conflicts of interest based on the sponsor's top donor industries. Balderson's largest donor sectors are Health Professionals, contributing $120 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $37.5 million. However, these sectors do not have a direct connection to the subject matter of the bill, which focuses on load forecasting enhancements, likely related to energy or utility management. The absence of overlapping interests suggests that the financial motivations of the sponsor's donors do not align with the bill's objectives, minimizing potential conflicts. Moreover, the lobbying activity associated with the bill does not indicate any significant financial backing from the sponsor's top donor industries, further supporting a low risk assessment.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $140,000
QUECTEL WIRELESS SOLUTIONS CO., LTD. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS $90,000
CONNECTIONS HEALTH SOLUTIONS MCDERMOTT+ LLC $60,000
CAMBER HEALTH MCDERMOTT+ LLC $50,000
CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF WINEGRAPE GROWERS TORREY ADVISORY GROUP (FORMERLY MICHAEL TORREY ASSOCIATES, LLC) $50,000
BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES BYD MOTORS, LLC AND VARIOUS U.S. SUBSIDIARIES $20,000
PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC PAYSAFE PAYMENT PROCESSING SOLUTIONS LLC $20,000
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
IOWA TRIBE OF KANSAS AND NEBRASKA - NUWEH MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
VIFCARE MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
GREENPOWER BX LLC MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
CLARITY MR. MARK KOPEC undisclosed
ABRAWORKS LIMITED BURRELL INTERNATIONAL GROUP LLC undisclosed
THE PARTNERSHIP TO ADVANCE VIRTUAL CARE (PAVC) MCDERMOTT+ LLC undisclosed
MBDA INCORPORATED MBDA INCORPORATED undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Troy Balderson, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us