H.R. 9353

H.R. 9353: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exempt qualified religious institutions from the excise tax on investment income.

Introduced Mike Kelly (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9353 proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code to exempt qualified religious institutions from paying an excise tax on their investment income. This means that religious organizations that meet certain criteria would no longer be taxed on the money they earn from investments.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9353 argue that this bill provides necessary financial relief to religious institutions, allowing them to allocate more resources towards their community services and outreach programs. Advocates highlight that the exemption recognizes the unique role that these institutions play in society.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9353 express concern that the bill could lead to a significant loss of tax revenue, which could impact public services. Some argue that it may also create an uneven playing field by favoring religious organizations over secular charities and nonprofits, potentially undermining the principle of separation of church and state.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The bill H.R. 9353 aims to exempt qualified religious institutions from the excise tax on investment income. Analysis of the sponsor, Mike Kelly's, top donor industries reveals no direct overlaps with the subject matter of the bill. The lobbying activity in this policy area shows contributions from various companies, but these contributions do not appear to directly influence or relate to the interests of religious institutions or tax exemptions. The largest contributions come from industries such as telecommunications and energy, which do not have a clear connection to the bill's intent. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest is assessed as low, as there are no evident financial incentives for the sponsor that would compromise the integrity of the legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERISIGN, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $90,000
VIASAT, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $80,000
REGULUS GLOBAL, LLC RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $70,000
NEXT GLOBAL CAPITAL, INC. OBO WHITEFOX DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $60,000
HABERMATOLEL POMO OF UPPER LAKE TRIBE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
AI POLICY NETWORK INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $45,000
STREET SMARTS VR SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
NATILUS SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC. OBO PRIETO BATTERY, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
SACHEM, INC. RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $30,000
PLUG POWER RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $20,000
VLS ENVIRONMENTAL SOLUTIONS BISER STRATEGIES, LLC $20,000
KYLE HOUSE GROUP, LLC SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $10,000
SWIFT CURRENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. TRIAD STRATEGIES, LLC. undisclosed
PRECISION CUSTOM COMPONENTS, LLC TRIAD STRATEGIES, LLC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Kelly, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us