H.R. 9357

H.R. 9357: To cancel the registration of all uses of the pesticide paraquat, and for other purposes.

Introduced Anna Luna (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9357 aims to cancel the registration of all uses of the pesticide paraquat, which is known for its toxicity and potential health risks to humans and the environment. The bill seeks to eliminate the legal use of this pesticide across the United States.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9357 have praised the bill for prioritizing public health and environmental safety. Many environmental advocacy groups have lauded the move as a significant step toward reducing the risks associated with toxic pesticides and promoting safer agricultural practices.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9357 argue that banning paraquat could lead to negative consequences for farmers who rely on the pesticide for crop management. Some agricultural industry representatives have expressed concerns that the bill may disrupt farming operations and decrease crop yields, potentially leading to higher food prices.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Environmental Protection

The analysis of H.R. 9357, which seeks to cancel the registration of all uses of the pesticide paraquat, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Anna Luna's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in pesticide regulation, which minimizes the potential for conflicts of interest. While there is lobbying activity in the broader policy area, the amounts contributed by these entities, such as ZIXI LLC ($20,000) and PDV Wireless ($50,000), do not indicate a direct financial incentive tied to the cancellation of paraquat's registration. Therefore, the risk of conflict is assessed as low, as the financial interests of the donors do not align with the bill's objectives.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
PDV WIRELESS (NOW DBA ANTERIX) CARPENTER STRATEGIC CONSULTING LLC $50,000
GROUPE SEB GROUPE SEB $50,000
GREEN BUILDING INITIATIVE JENNA HAMILTON $30,000
LEADING BUILDERS OF AMERICA JENNA HAMILTON $30,000
ZIXI LLC CARPENTER STRATEGIC CONSULTING LLC $20,000
CENTERLIGHT HEALTHCARE, INC. CENTERLIGHT HEALTHCARE, INC. $13,500
HOME BUILDER ASSOCIATION OF CENTRAL ARIZONA JENNA HAMILTON $10,000
ICF INTERNATIONAL INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $10,000
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL AIR RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL & TRANSPORTATION WORKERS $10,000
AMERICAN TORT REFORM ASSOCIATION AMERICAN TORT REFORM ASSOCIATION $10,000
ALLIANTGROUP ALLIANTGROUP undisclosed
THE CITY OF ATLANTIS THE MERCHANT STRATEGY, INC. undisclosed
CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC CATSKILL MOUNTAINKEEPER INC undisclosed
XFS GLOBAL LLC MR. BRIAN DEARING undisclosed
OUTDOOR VENTURE CORPORATION MR. BRIAN DEARING undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Anna Luna, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $280,000,000
Individuals: $280,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $87,500,000
Individuals: $87,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us