H.R. 9362

H.R. 9362: To amend the District of Columbia Home Rule Act to provide for the automatic appointment of judges to the District of Columbia courts without the advice and consent of the Senate, and for other purposes.

Introduced Eleanor Norton (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9362 proposes to change the process for appointing judges to the courts in the District of Columbia. Specifically, it would allow judges to be appointed automatically without needing approval from the Senate, streamlining the appointment process.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9362 argue that this bill would expedite the judicial appointment process in the District of Columbia, ensuring that courts are adequately staffed and can function effectively. They believe it enhances local governance by allowing the District to have more control over its judicial appointments.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9362 express concerns that bypassing Senate approval for judicial appointments undermines the checks and balances system. They fear it could lead to politically motivated appointments and diminish the quality of judicial oversight in the District of Columbia.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Law

The analysis of bill H.R. 9362, which pertains to the automatic appointment of judges to the District of Columbia courts, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Eleanor Norton, and her top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes significant contributions from various entities, such as Vertex Pharmaceuticals ($60,000) and Intermountain Health ($50,000), but these industries do not directly relate to judicial appointments or the legislative subject matter of the bill. Therefore, the risk of conflicts of interest appears minimal. Voters should note that while there is substantial lobbying activity, it does not intersect with the specific legislative agenda of this bill, suggesting that the sponsor's decisions may not be unduly influenced by donor interests.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERTEX PHARMACEUTICALS INCORPORATED MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC $60,000
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTH MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP $50,000
WAYFINDER GROUP (OBO RESEARCH CORPORATION OF THE UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII) RED MAPLE CONSULTING, LLC $40,000
FRONTIER INFRASTRUCTURE HOLDINGS LLC KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC $30,000
ECKERD CONNECTS KOUNTOUPES DENHAM CARR & REID, LLC $30,000
SMART APPROACHES TO MARIJUANA OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
FEDERATION OF ELECTRIC POWER COS OF JAPAN GEORGE H. DENISON $10,000
MAYO CLINIC MCDERMOTT WILL & SCHULTE LLP undisclosed
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
THE BIG TEN CONFERENCE, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
THE BIG 12 CONFERENCE, INC. MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
SOUTHEASTERN CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
PAC-12 CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed
ATLANTIC COAST CONFERENCE MARSHALL & POPP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Eleanor Norton, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us