H.R. 9373

H.R. 9373: To amend title 49, United States Code, to provide for certain remedies for air transportation passengers with disabilities who are discriminated against, and for other purposes.

Introduced Dina Titus (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9373, titled the Safeguarding Americans From Extremist Risk (SAFER) at the Border Act, was introduced in the 118th Congress on August 16, 2024, by Representative Nicholas A. Langworthy. The bill aims to prohibit the Secretary of Homeland Security from granting parole to certain dangerous aliens, thereby restricting the entry of individuals deemed to pose extremist risks into the United States. The bill was referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary on the same day.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9373 argue that the bill is a necessary measure to enhance national security by preventing individuals with extremist ties from entering the country. They believe that by restricting the Secretary of Homeland Security's ability to grant parole to certain dangerous aliens, the bill will help safeguard American citizens from potential threats.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9373 contend that the bill could lead to overly broad restrictions on immigration, potentially affecting individuals who do not pose a genuine threat. They express concerns that the legislation may undermine the discretionary authority of the Department of Homeland Security and could result in unintended consequences for asylum seekers and other vulnerable populations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9373, which aims to provide remedies for air transportation passengers with disabilities, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor, Dina Titus's, top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area primarily involves organizations that do not directly relate to air transportation or disability rights. For instance, Altria Client Services and the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation have contributed significant amounts ($40,000 each), but their focus does not intersect with the bill's objectives. The total lobbying contributions from relevant entities do not indicate a strong financial influence that could lead to conflicts of interest in this case. Thus, the risk of conflict is assessed as low.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY $144,981
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $40,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION $40,000
GOTRIANGLE MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $30,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF CDFI CEOS MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $20,000
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB ALEXANDER J. BECKLES, L.L.C. $20,000
CITY OF GLADEWATER, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $12,000
CITY OF CRANDALL, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
CITY OF JUSTIN, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
THE LIVINGSTON GROUP ON BEHALF OF INNOVATIVE VACCINE TECHNOLOGIES MAGILL ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
LUMBEE TRIBE HOLDINGS, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
CITY OF CLEVELAND, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF RIO HONDO, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
HOWARD COUNTY, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Dina Titus, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $80,000,000
Individuals: $80,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $25,000,000
Individuals: $25,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us