H.R. 9380

H.R. 9380: To amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act to require creditors to consider certain additional credit information when making mortgage loans, and for other purposes.

Introduced Nikema Williams (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9380 aims to amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act by requiring creditors to take into account additional credit information when evaluating mortgage loan applications. This could include factors beyond traditional credit scores, potentially allowing more individuals to qualify for loans.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9380 argue that the bill enhances access to mortgage loans for underserved communities by broadening the criteria used to assess creditworthiness. Media outlets highlight the potential for increased homeownership rates and economic growth as positive outcomes of this legislative change.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9380 express concern that requiring creditors to consider additional credit information could lead to increased risk for lenders and the potential for financial instability. Some media reports suggest that this could result in more defaults and undermine the integrity of the mortgage lending process.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9380, which aims to amend the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Nikema Williams' top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in mortgage lending or credit assessment practices, which minimizes the likelihood of conflicts of interest. Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in the broader policy area, the amounts contributed by these entities do not directly correlate with the bill's objectives, suggesting that the financial influence is not significant in this context. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the absence of direct donor overlap indicates a lower risk of conflicts affecting the legislative process.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CLINICAL PHARMACY $144,981
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $40,000
CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION $40,000
GOTRIANGLE MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $30,000
AFRICAN AMERICAN ALLIANCE OF CDFI CEOS MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) $20,000
BRISTOL MYERS SQUIBB ALEXANDER J. BECKLES, L.L.C. $20,000
CITY OF GLADEWATER, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $12,000
CITY OF CRANDALL, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
CITY OF JUSTIN, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
THE LIVINGSTON GROUP ON BEHALF OF INNOVATIVE VACCINE TECHNOLOGIES MAGILL ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
OPPORTUNITIES INDUSTRIALIZATION CENTER OF AMERICA, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
LUMBEE TRIBE HOLDINGS, INC. MCGUIREWOODS CONSULTING (A SUBSIDIARY OF MCGUIREWOODS LLP) undisclosed
CITY OF CLEVELAND, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF RIO HONDO, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed
HOWARD COUNTY, TEXAS LONE STAR CONSULTING, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Nikema Williams, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us