H.R. 9383

H.R. 9383: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to provide special rules with respect to the net operating losses of certain financial institutions.

Introduced Mike Carey (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9383 proposes changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 that would create special rules for how certain financial institutions can handle their net operating losses. This could allow these institutions to carry forward losses to offset future taxable income, potentially providing them with significant tax relief.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9383 argue that the bill will help stabilize the financial sector by allowing institutions to better manage their losses during economic downturns. They believe this could lead to increased lending and investment, ultimately benefiting the economy as a whole.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9383 express concern that the bill could disproportionately benefit large financial institutions at the expense of taxpayers. They argue that providing special tax rules for these entities may encourage risky behavior and undermine fiscal responsibility within the financial sector.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Mike Carey’s top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9383, which focuses on special rules for net operating losses of financial institutions, there is notable lobbying activity in the financial sector. The Vegas Chamber, which has contributed $30,000, and other entities involved in real estate and construction may have indirect interests in financial regulations that could affect their operations. The total lobbying contributions in this area amount to $260,000, indicating a significant interest in influencing financial policy. Voters should be aware that while direct conflicts are not evident, the financial implications of this bill could benefit donors indirectly connected to the financial sector.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN CONCRETE INSTITUTE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $80,000
ANNE PRAMAGGIORE CROSSROADS STRATEGIES, LLC $60,000
SIGHTLINE INTELLIGENCE C2 STRATEGIES $50,000
VEGAS CHAMBER PORTER GROUP, LLC $30,000
WASHOE COUNTY PORTER GROUP, LLC $30,000
VETERANS ASSOCIATION OF REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONALS, INC. C2 STRATEGIES $30,000
EO SOLUTIONS LLC PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
WASHOE COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION PORTER GROUP, LLC $20,000
ULINE BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES $20,000
RTC SOUTHERN NEVADA PORTER GROUP, LLC $10,000
WISH BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN STATE CRANBERRY GROWERS ASSOCIATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WISCONSIN CRANBERRY RESEARCH AND EDUCATION FOUNDATION BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
WD SCHORSCH LLC BROYDRICK & ASSOCIATES undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mike Carey, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us