H.R. 9454

H.R. 9454: To direct the Secretary of Transportation to establish a program to support the research, design, development, demonstration, and deployment of zero-emission vessels and retrofit or replacement of existing vessels with zero-emission vessel tec

Introduced Nanette Barragán (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9454 aims to create a program under the Secretary of Transportation to promote the research, design, development, demonstration, and deployment of zero-emission vessels. It also focuses on retrofitting or replacing existing vessels with technology that reduces emissions to zero.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9454 praise the bill for its potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the maritime industry. They highlight its role in advancing clean technology and fostering innovation, which could lead to job creation in the green tech sector.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9454 raise concerns about the costs associated with developing and implementing zero-emission vessel technology. Some argue that the bill may impose burdensome regulations on the shipping industry and could hinder economic growth, particularly for smaller operators who may struggle to afford retrofitting or replacement.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
4/10
Risk Level
Medium
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Environmental Protection

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the subject matter of H.R. 9454, there are significant lobbying activities in the realm of zero-emission technologies and related sectors. Notably, Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc. contributed $60,000, and Occidental Petroleum Corporation contributed $20,000, both of which could have interests in the development of zero-emission vessels. Additionally, Respond-US, with a substantial contribution of $140,000, may also have a vested interest in this area. The presence of these lobbying activities suggests a potential influence on the bill's direction, even if direct financial ties are not evident. Voters should be aware of these connections as they may indicate underlying interests that could affect the bill's implementation and focus.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Nanette Barragán, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us