H.R. 9465

H.R. 9465: To amend chapter 19 of title 37, United States Code, to provide for a one-time corrective increase and annual adjustments of certain special and incentive pays for members of the Armed Forces, and for other purposes.

Introduced Abraham Hamadeh (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9465 aims to amend existing laws regarding military pay by providing a one-time increase in special and incentive pays for certain members of the Armed Forces. Additionally, it proposes annual adjustments to these pays to ensure they keep pace with inflation and other economic factors.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9465 have praised the bill as a necessary step to ensure that military personnel are fairly compensated for their service. Media outlets have highlighted the importance of recognizing the unique challenges faced by service members and the need for adequate financial support.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9465 argue that while the intention to increase military pay is commendable, the bill does not go far enough in addressing broader issues of military compensation and benefits. Some media reports have pointed out potential funding challenges and questioned whether the adjustments will be sufficient to meet the needs of service members.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9465, which aims to amend military pay structures, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Abraham Hamadeh's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in military compensation, which minimizes the potential for conflicts of interest. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes significant contributions from various organizations, such as RESPOND-US ($140,000) and GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. ($60,000), but these entities do not directly relate to military pay. Therefore, the risk of undue influence on the bill is assessed as low, as the financial interests represented by the donors do not align with the legislative focus on Armed Forces compensation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Abraham Hamadeh, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us