H.R. 9475

H.R. 9475: To establish the National Task Force on Caregiving Youth.

Introduced Morgan McGarvey (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9475 aims to create the National Task Force on Caregiving Youth, which would likely focus on addressing the needs and challenges faced by young individuals who take on caregiving responsibilities for family members. The task force would assess the situation of these youth, propose solutions, and potentially recommend policies to support them.

Positive Media Summary

Media coverage has highlighted the importance of recognizing and supporting young caregivers, emphasizing that the establishment of this task force could lead to much-needed resources and advocacy for this often-overlooked group. Supporters argue that the task force will help raise awareness about the unique challenges faced by caregiving youth and promote their well-being.

Negative Media Summary

Critics have raised concerns that the establishment of a task force may not lead to tangible results or funding for programs that directly assist caregiving youth. Some media outlets have pointed out that without a clear plan for implementation, the task force could become another bureaucratic entity that fails to address the urgent needs of these young caregivers.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9475, which aims to establish the National Task Force on Caregiving Youth, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Morgan McGarvey's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes various entities such as Occidental Petroleum Corporation and Ginkgo Bioworks, Inc., which have contributed significant amounts ($20,000 and $60,000 respectively). However, these contributions do not directly relate to caregiving youth, indicating a low potential for conflict of interest. The absence of direct ties between the bill's focus and the financial interests of the sponsors' donors suggests that the risk of influence is minimal, allowing for a more objective legislative process.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Morgan McGarvey, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us