H.R. 9476

H.R. 9476: To direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to coordinate with the Secretary of Health and Human Services in administering the Veterans Community Care Program, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mariannette Miller-Meeks (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9476 directs the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to work together with the Secretary of Health and Human Services to manage the Veterans Community Care Program. This program is designed to provide veterans with access to healthcare services in their communities, potentially improving their healthcare options and coordination between agencies.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9476 have praised the bill for enhancing collaboration between the Veterans Affairs and Health and Human Services departments, which could lead to better healthcare outcomes for veterans. The initiative is seen as a step towards improving access to timely and quality care for those who have served the country.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9476 have expressed concerns that increased bureaucratic coordination may lead to delays in care and complications in the administration of the Veterans Community Care Program. Some worry that the bill may not adequately address existing issues within the healthcare system for veterans, and that it could result in confusion rather than improved services.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9476, sponsored by Mariannette Miller-Meeks, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter concerning the Veterans Community Care Program. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in veterans' health care, which reduces the likelihood of conflicts of interest. However, there is notable lobbying activity in this policy area, with significant contributions from various entities, including RESPOND-US ($140,000) and GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. ($60,000). While these contributions are substantial, they do not directly correlate with the bill's focus on veterans' care, suggesting that the risk of conflict is minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not necessarily imply a direct influence on the legislation at hand.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mariannette Miller-Meeks, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $680,000,000
Individuals: $680,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $212,500,000
Individuals: $212,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us