H.R. 9484

H.R. 9484: To require the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study on the effect of new commercial and industrial water users on the amount of water maintained by Corps of Engineers reservoirs, and for other purposes.

Introduced Hillary Scholten (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9484 requires the Secretary of the Army to conduct a study examining how new commercial and industrial water users impact the water levels maintained in reservoirs managed by the Corps of Engineers. The bill aims to assess the implications of increased water usage on these critical water resources.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9484 have praised the bill for its proactive approach to water resource management, emphasizing the importance of understanding the effects of commercial and industrial water usage on public reservoirs. They argue that the study will provide valuable data that can inform future policies and ensure sustainable water management.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9484 express concerns that the bill may delay necessary action on water resource allocation by focusing on a study rather than immediate solutions. Some argue that it could be seen as a bureaucratic hurdle that might hinder economic development and the needs of growing industries that rely on water access.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Water Resources Development

The analysis of H.R. 9484, sponsored by Hillary Scholten, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. This indicates a low likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from the financial contributions received by the sponsor. The bill focuses on studying the impact of new commercial and industrial water users on water levels in Corps of Engineers reservoirs, a topic that does not appear to be influenced by the interests of the sponsor's donors. Given that there are no overlapping industries, the potential for donor influence on the legislative process is minimal. Voters should be aware that while campaign contributions can sometimes lead to perceived conflicts, in this case, the absence of relevant donor industries suggests a lower risk of undue influence.

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Hillary Scholten, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us