H.R. 9510

H.R. 9510: To direct the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health to make publicly available all national policies of the Veterans Health Administration.

Introduced Maxine Dexter (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9510 is a bill that aims to require the Under Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Health to make all national policies of the Veterans Health Administration publicly accessible. This would enhance transparency regarding the policies that govern veterans' health care services.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9510 have welcomed the bill as a significant step towards increasing transparency in veterans' health care. They argue that making policy information publicly available will empower veterans and their families to better understand their rights and the services available to them.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9510 express concerns that the bill may lead to the dissemination of sensitive information that could compromise the effectiveness of the Veterans Health Administration. Some argue that while transparency is important, it should not come at the cost of operational security and efficiency.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of H.R. 9510, sponsored by Maxine Dexter, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor's top donor industries. The bill aims to enhance transparency by making national policies of the Veterans Health Administration publicly available, a move that is generally supported across various sectors. While there is notable lobbying activity in the healthcare and veterans' affairs space, the contributions from industries such as Occidental Petroleum and Peabody Energy do not directly relate to veterans' health policies. The total lobbying amounts from these entities do not indicate a concentrated effort to influence this specific legislation, suggesting that the risk of conflict of interest is minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not appear to create a significant conflict in this case.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Maxine Dexter, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us