H.R. 9511

H.R. 9511: To require the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency to develop a flood insurance information tool, and for other purposes.

Introduced Cleo Fields (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9511 mandates that the Administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) create a tool to provide information about flood insurance. This tool is intended to help individuals and communities better understand their flood insurance options and coverage, ultimately aiming to improve preparedness and response to flooding events.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets have praised H.R. 9511 for its proactive approach to flood preparedness. Supporters argue that the flood insurance information tool will empower homeowners and communities by providing critical information that can lead to better decision-making regarding flood risk management and insurance coverage.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9511 have raised concerns about the potential costs associated with developing and maintaining the flood insurance information tool. Some argue that the bill may not adequately address the complexities of flood insurance or provide sufficient support for those in high-risk areas, leading to skepticism about its overall effectiveness.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

The analysis of H.R. 9511, which aims to develop a flood insurance information tool, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Cleo Fields' top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in flood insurance, which suggests a lower risk of conflicts of interest. However, there is notable lobbying activity in the broader policy area related to flood management and insurance, with significant contributions from various entities such as RESPOND-US ($140,000) and GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. ($60,000). Despite these contributions, the lack of direct industry overlap indicates that the potential for conflicts of interest remains minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not directly tie to the sponsor's financial backers in this instance.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
RESPOND-US CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $140,000
SILVERLINING ALPINE GROUP PARTNERS, LLC. $80,000
MEDLINE CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
GINKGO BIOWORKS, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
PEABODY ENERGY CORPORATION CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $50,000
LUFTHANSA GERMAN AIRLINES CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $50,000
MERIDIAM INFRASTRUCTURE CAPITOL POINT GROUP, LLC $40,000
LEO TECHNOLOGIES BUTLER SNOW LLP $30,000
MAXIMUS BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
JOHNSON & JOHNSON BRICK STREET STRATEGY $30,000
OCCIDENTAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION GTB PARTNERS $20,000
CHAMBERS COUNTY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY BUTLER SNOW LLP $15,000
HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION HEARTH, PATIO & BARBECUE ASSOCIATION $15,000
THE UNIVERSITY OF WEST ALABAMA BUTLER SNOW LLP $12,000
BASIS PATH BUTLER SNOW LLP undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Cleo Fields, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us