H.R. 9512

H.R. 9512: To reauthorize the water storage program under Subtitle J of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, to authorize environmental restoration and recovery in the Sacramento River Basin, to authorize nonreimbursable Federal cont

Introduced James Gallagher (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9512 aims to reauthorize a water storage program established under a previous law, focusing on improving water infrastructure. It includes provisions for environmental restoration and recovery efforts in the Sacramento River Basin, which may involve federal funding for projects that enhance water management and ecosystem health in the area.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9512 have praised the bill for its potential to improve water storage capabilities and address environmental issues in the Sacramento River Basin. They argue that the reauthorization of the water storage program will help ensure a sustainable water supply, especially in times of drought, and promote ecological restoration efforts that benefit local wildlife and communities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9512 have expressed concerns that the bill may prioritize infrastructure projects at the expense of local ecosystems and communities. Some argue that the federal funding could lead to mismanagement of water resources or that it may not adequately address the underlying issues of water scarcity and environmental degradation in the region.

Conflict of Interest Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$100
PAC Percentage
0%
Committee
UNKNOWN

All donors are from Applied Materials, Inc., a technology company. There is no direct link between the company and the water storage or environmental restoration sectors, suggesting a low risk of conflict of interest.

Top PAC Donors to Sponsor

Top industries and organizations funding James Gallagher, from FEC data.

HALLIDAY, ROBERT $385
DEANE, TIMOTHY $231
DICKERSON, GARY $192

Source: FEC campaign finance records

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us