H.R. 9530

H.R. 9530: To require the Secretary of Transportation to issue regulations to prohibit certain cell phone voice communications on aircraft in scheduled passenger interstate or intrastate air transportation.

Introduced Hillary Scholten (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9530 is a bill that aims to require the Secretary of Transportation to create regulations that would ban certain voice communications made via cell phones on commercial aircraft during scheduled passenger flights, whether they are traveling within a state or between states.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9530 argue that the bill will enhance passenger comfort and reduce disturbances during flights. Many travelers appreciate a quiet flying environment and believe that prohibiting cell phone voice calls will lead to a more pleasant travel experience.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9530 contend that the bill may infringe on personal freedoms and the growing trend of connectivity in modern travel. Some argue that with appropriate regulations, limited voice communications could be allowed without significantly disrupting the cabin environment.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The analysis of H.R. 9530, which seeks to prohibit certain cell phone voice communications on aircraft, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor Hillary Scholten's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in the relevant policy area includes contributions from various organizations, such as the Defense Credit Union Council ($190,000) and eHealth, Inc. ($100,000), but these do not directly relate to the regulation of cell phone communications on aircraft. Given the lack of direct financial ties between the sponsors' donors and the bill's subject, the risk of conflicts of interest appears minimal. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists in the broader transportation sector, it does not specifically target the issues addressed by this bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION $312,662
DEFENSE CREDIT UNION COUNCIL DEFENSE CREDIT UNION COUNCIL $190,000
EHEALTH, INC. EHEALTH, INC. $100,000
ID.ME, LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
CARE ACTION NOW, INC. CARE ACTION NOW, INC. $53,000
PHLOW CORPORATION WESTMORELAND160, LLC $50,000
DS ADMIRAL BIDCO ZERO ONE STRATEGIES $50,000
POLARIS INC. HUNTON ANDREWS KURTH LLP $50,000
NEW WORLD STRATEGIES INC BOB GOOD LLC $10,000
AANEM AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROMUSCULAR AND ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC MEDICINE AANEM AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NEUROMUSCULAR AND ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC MEDICINE undisclosed
TOWN OF PROSPERITY, SC LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF FOREST ACRES LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
COLLETON COUNTY LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NEWBERRY COUNTY LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF EASLEY LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Hillary Scholten, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us