H.R. 9540

H.R. 9540: To address the housing crisis through strong perpetual affordability provisions and shared equity housing models, bold investments to increase and preserve the national affordable housing supply, center inclusive local zoning and land use, pro

Introduced Becca Balint (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9540 aims to tackle the housing crisis in the U.S. by implementing strong affordability measures and promoting shared equity housing models. The bill proposes significant investments to both increase and maintain the supply of affordable housing nationwide. It also emphasizes the importance of inclusive local zoning and land use policies to support these goals.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9540 have praised it for its comprehensive approach to the housing crisis, highlighting the focus on affordability and shared equity as innovative solutions. Many advocates believe that the bill could significantly improve access to affordable housing for low- and middle-income families, fostering community stability and economic growth.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9540 express concerns that the bill may impose undue regulations on local governments and hinder property rights. Some argue that the proposed zoning reforms could lead to increased bureaucracy and that the funding mechanisms may not be sustainable, potentially leading to future fiscal challenges.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Housing and Community Development

The analysis of H.R. 9540, sponsored by Becca Balint, indicates a low risk of conflicts of interest. The primary focus of the bill is on addressing the housing crisis through affordability provisions and shared equity models. The sponsor's top donor industries, which include Health Professionals ($120 million) and Retired individuals ($37.5 million), do not have direct overlaps with the housing sector. This suggests that the financial interests of the sponsor's donors are not directly aligned with the legislative intent of the bill. Furthermore, while there is lobbying activity in the housing policy area, the amounts are relatively modest compared to the sponsor's overall donor contributions, indicating limited influence from these entities on the bill's content. Voters should be aware that while there are significant contributions from health professionals, they do not pertain to housing issues, thus reducing the likelihood of conflicts.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $810,990
AMERICAN LEGION THE AMERICAN LEGION $190,000
ACADEMY OF MODEL AERONAUTICS CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
CALISTA CORPORATION CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
PHARMA & BIOPHARMA OUTSOURCING ASSOCIATION PHARMA & BIOPHARMA OUTSOURCING ASSOCIATION $50,000
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
PUGET SOUND ENERGY ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $30,000
KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $20,000
MICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INC BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC. $10,000
EXODIGO, LLC (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $10,000
TERAMIND, INC. (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $5,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE undisclosed
INTELSAT GENERAL CORPORATION VELOS undisclosed
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Becca Balint, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us