H.R. 9555

H.R. 9555: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to allow a credit against tax for qualified residence interest paid or accrued during the taxable year, and for other purposes.

Introduced George Latimer (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9555 proposes to amend the Internal Revenue Code to allow taxpayers to receive a tax credit for qualified residence interest that they pay or accrue during the taxable year. This change aims to provide financial relief to homeowners by making it easier for them to deduct interest payments on their residences from their taxable income.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9555 have praised the bill for its potential to ease the financial burden on homeowners, especially in the context of rising interest rates and housing costs. The proposed tax credit is seen as a way to stimulate the housing market and promote homeownership, which could lead to economic growth.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9555 argue that the bill may disproportionately benefit higher-income homeowners, raising concerns about equity in the tax system. Some media outlets have also pointed out that the bill could lead to increased federal revenue losses, which may impact funding for other essential services and programs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of H.R. 9555 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter, which pertains to tax credits for qualified residence interest, and the sponsor George Latimer's top donor industries, namely Health Professionals and Retired individuals. While Latimer's donors have contributed significant amounts, totaling $157,500,000, these contributions do not appear to influence the specific tax-related provisions of the bill. The lobbying activity associated with this bill does not directly connect to the sponsor's donor industries, further indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while large donations can raise concerns, in this case, the lack of overlap suggests that the bill is unlikely to be swayed by donor interests.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE $810,990
AMERICAN LEGION THE AMERICAN LEGION $190,000
ARES MANAGEMENT LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $80,000
CALISTA CORPORATION CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $50,000
PHARMA & BIOPHARMA OUTSOURCING ASSOCIATION PHARMA & BIOPHARMA OUTSOURCING ASSOCIATION $50,000
NATIONAL EDUCATION ASSOCIATION ROCK CREEK COUNSEL $40,000
KOOTENAI TRIBE OF IDAHO CAPITOL HILL POLICY GROUP LLC $20,000
MICRON TECHNOLOGIES, INC. OFF HILL STRATEGIES L.L.C. $20,000
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS INC BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF KANSAS, INC. $10,000
EXODIGO, LLC (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $10,000
TERAMIND, INC. (ON BEHALF OF GROISMAN, LLC) EJK, LLC $5,000
COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE COMMITTEE TO PROTECT HEALTH CARE undisclosed
INTELSAT GENERAL CORPORATION VELOS undisclosed
JETBLUE AIRWAYS CORPORATION ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOTT, LLC undisclosed
NACHA, THE ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS ASSOCIATION NACHA, THE ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS ASSOCIATION undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding George Latimer, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us