H.R. 9557

H.R. 9557: To amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to allow certain grantees to use Community Development Block Grant amounts for natural disaster mitigation activities, and for other purposes.

Introduced Sam Liccardo (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9557 amends the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to permit specific grantees to allocate Community Development Block Grant funds for activities aimed at mitigating natural disasters. This means that communities can use these federal funds to enhance their resilience against disasters such as floods, hurricanes, and wildfires, thereby improving safety and preparedness.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9557 have praised the bill for its proactive approach to disaster preparedness, highlighting that it empowers local governments to better protect their communities. Media outlets have emphasized the importance of utilizing federal funds for natural disaster mitigation, especially in areas frequently affected by extreme weather events, viewing this legislation as a necessary step towards building safer and more resilient communities.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9557 have raised concerns about the potential misuse of Community Development Block Grant funds, arguing that allowing flexibility in spending could lead to misallocation or inefficiency. Some media reports have pointed out that without strict oversight, there is a risk that the funds might not be used effectively for disaster mitigation, potentially undermining the original intent of the program.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Housing and Community Development

The bill H.R. 9557 aims to amend the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974 to allow certain grantees to utilize Community Development Block Grant amounts for natural disaster mitigation activities. The sponsor, Sam Liccardo, has significant contributions from the health professionals industry, totaling $120 million, and from retired individuals, amounting to $37.5 million. However, there are no direct overlaps between these donor industries and the subject matter of the bill, indicating a low risk of conflict of interest. While lobbying activity is present in this policy area, the contributions from Liccardo's top donors do not appear to influence the bill's objectives directly, as they are not related to housing or disaster mitigation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION AMERICAN PHYSICAL THERAPY ASSOCIATION $312,662
STE NORTH AMERICA, INC. (FORMERLY ST ENGINEERING NORTH AMERICA, INC.) STE NORTH AMERICA, INC. (FORMERLY ST ENGINEERING NORTH AMERICA, INC.) $210,000
ID.ME, LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
BLUE WATER AUTONOMY, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $60,000
POLK COUNTY, IOWA CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $30,000
GEORGIA POWER COMPANY CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $20,000
ADVANCING MENTAL HEALTH FOR MILITARY FAMILIES, LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. $10,000
TOWN OF PROSPERITY, SC LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF FOREST ACRES LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
COLLETON COUNTY LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NEWBERRY COUNTY LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
CITY OF EASLEY LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
TOWN OF IRMO, SC LAKE SHORE STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
RECORDED FUTURE, INC. RECORDED FUTURE, INC. undisclosed
CITY OF MARION, IOWA CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Sam Liccardo, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us