H.R. 9587

H.R. 9587: To amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act to eliminate certain requirements under the summer food service program for children, and for other purposes.

Introduced LaMonica McIver (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9587 aims to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act by removing specific requirements related to the summer food service program for children. This could potentially simplify the process for providing meals to children during the summer months.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9587 argue that eliminating certain requirements will streamline the summer food service program, making it easier for organizations to provide meals to children in need. This change is seen as a way to increase access to nutritious food during the summer, when many children do not have access to school meals.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9587 express concerns that removing requirements could lead to reduced oversight and quality of the meals provided. There are fears that without certain standards, the program may not adequately serve vulnerable populations, potentially undermining the nutritional needs of children during the summer months.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$157,500,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The bill H.R. 9587 aims to amend the Richard B. Russell National School Lunch Act, specifically targeting the summer food service program for children. The primary sponsor, LaMonica McIver, has significant financial backing from the health professionals industry, totaling $120 million, and from retired individuals, amounting to $37.5 million. However, there are no direct overlaps between the subject matter of the bill and the industries of her top donors, indicating a low likelihood of conflicts of interest. The absence of direct industry connections suggests that the motivations behind the bill may not be influenced by her financial supporters. Additionally, while there is lobbying activity in the policy area, it does not appear to directly correlate with McIver's donor base, further mitigating potential conflict concerns.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CREA MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $60,000
CORE POWER (US) INC. FRONTLINE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $37,000
THE PACIFIC COMPANIES MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
INLAND GROUP MG HOUSING STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
CITY OF GRESHAM, OREGON FRONTLINE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $21,000
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF STRATA CRITICAL INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS INDUSTRY ALLIANCE (BPIA) undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF PHANTOM NEURO INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
AAV, LTD. TARAS, LLC undisclosed
EXPLORER AIRCRAFT, INC. TARAS, LLC undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF KTA-TATOR, INC. INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS OBO GLOBAL BUSINESS TRAVEL ASSOCIATION DININO ASSOCIATES, LLC undisclosed
AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS ON BEHALF OF MAIN LINE HEALTH INTEGRUS STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
PRESLER PERSISTENCE LLC FRONTLINE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed
MODE MOBILE FRONTLINE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding LaMonica McIver, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us