H.R. 9704

H.R. 9704: To direct the Secretary of Agriculture to make economic assistance payments to qualifying producers for certain revenue losses with respect to covered commodities, and for other purposes.

Introduced Shomari Figures (D) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9704 aims to provide financial assistance to eligible agricultural producers who have experienced revenue losses related to specific covered commodities. The bill directs the Secretary of Agriculture to implement these economic assistance payments to help support farmers affected by adverse conditions or market fluctuations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9704 have praised the bill as a crucial step in providing much-needed relief to farmers facing economic hardships. Agricultural advocates emphasize that the assistance will help stabilize the farming industry and ensure food security by supporting producers who are vital to the economy.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9704 argue that the bill may not adequately address the root causes of revenue loss in agriculture and could lead to dependency on government assistance. Some have raised concerns about the potential for misallocation of funds and the bill's long-term impact on agricultural sustainability.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Agriculture and Food

The analysis of H.R. 9704, which aims to provide economic assistance payments to qualifying producers for revenue losses related to covered commodities, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the sponsor, Shomari Figures' top donor industries. The top donors primarily represent sectors such as automotive innovation, software, healthcare, and public land trusts, none of which have a direct financial stake in agricultural revenue loss assistance. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes significant contributions from various organizations, with the American College of Emergency Physicians contributing the largest amount at $498,299. However, these contributions do not indicate a conflict with the agricultural focus of the bill, as they pertain to healthcare rather than agriculture or commodity production. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest appears low, as the financial interests of the donors do not align with the provisions of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS AMERICAN COLLEGE OF EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS $498,299
TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND $150,000
COLLIER COLLECTIVE, LLC MCCOLL STRATEGIES LLC $40,000
HART HEALTH STRATEGIES TIM YEHL, LLC $40,000
PANO AI PANO AI $40,000
ALLIANCE FOR AUTOMOTIVE INNOVATION TIM YEHL, LLC $30,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
PSEG SERVICES CORPORATION TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
COUNTY OF NAPA PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
LAKE COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NEVADA COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
HUMBOLDT COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $15,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COUNTY HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATORS PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
NATIONAL CHILD SUPPORT ENFORCEMENT ASSOCIATION PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $10,000
CLARK COUNTY PARAGON GOVERNMENT RELATIONS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Shomari Figures, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us