H.R. 9787

H.R. 9787: To amend the “Covenant to Establish a Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands in Political Union with the United States of America” to provide for modifications of the labor stabilization program transition.

Introduced Kimberlyn King-Hinds (R) HOUSE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.R. 9787 proposes changes to the existing labor stabilization program in the Northern Mariana Islands, which is part of an agreement with the United States. The bill aims to modify how this program transitions, likely addressing labor issues and economic stability in the region.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.R. 9787 argue that the bill is a necessary step to ensure economic stability in the Northern Mariana Islands. They highlight that the modifications to the labor stabilization program will help protect workers' rights and promote sustainable economic growth in the territory.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.R. 9787 express concerns that the proposed changes may undermine labor protections and lead to exploitation of workers in the Northern Mariana Islands. Some argue that the bill could prioritize economic interests over the well-being of local residents.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Labor and Employment

The analysis of H.R. 9787, which aims to amend the labor stabilization program in the Northern Mariana Islands, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Kimberlyn King-Hinds' top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The top donors do not appear to have a vested interest in labor stabilization or related industries, which minimizes the potential for conflicts of interest. While there is significant lobbying activity in the broader policy area, such as the $220,000 from CorMedix Inc. and $70,000 from the Telecommunications Industry Association, these do not directly correlate with the labor stabilization focus of the bill. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the absence of direct donor overlap suggests a lower risk of undue influence on the legislative process.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
CORMEDIX INC. CORMEDIX INC. $220,000
BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE BATTELLE MEMORIAL INSTITUTE $180,000
TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION TELECOMMUNICATIONS INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION $70,000
TERRANOVA INC FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
POSEIDON AEROSPACE FRONTERA GROUP $30,000
OBSIDIA SEMICONDUCTORS FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
SAALEX CORPORATION FRONTERA GROUP $20,000
HERTHA METALS FRONTERA GROUP $15,000
MN8 ENERGY LLC MN8 ENERGY LLC $15,000
AMERICAN LIBRARY ASSOCIATION A LEARNED HAND, LLC $10,860
RISK AND INSURANCE MANAGEMENT SOCIETY MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $10,000
VERMONT CAPTIVE INSURANCE ASSOCIATION MCINTYRE & LEMON, PLLC $8,000
AMERICAN TRAILER MANUFACTURERS COALITION WILEY REIN LLP undisclosed
UNCAC COALITION UNCAC COALITION undisclosed
CFA INSTITUTE CFA INSTITUTE undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Kimberlyn King-Hinds, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us