H.Res. 1142

H.Res. 1142: Providing for disposition of the Senate amendment to the bill (H.R. 7147) making further consolidated appropriations for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026, and for other purposes.

Agreed To (Simple Resolution) Michelle Fischbach (R) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1142 is a procedural resolution passed by the U.S. House of Representatives on March 27, 2026. It outlines how the House will handle the Senate's amendment to H.R. 7147, a bill that provides funding for various federal programs for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2026. Specifically, the resolution allows the House to accept the Senate's changes with further modifications, ensuring that the appropriations process continues smoothly.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of H.Res. 1142, primarily from the Republican Party, praised the resolution for facilitating the timely passage of essential funding measures. They emphasized that the resolution's adoption demonstrates the House's commitment to maintaining government operations without interruption and reflects effective legislative collaboration.

Negative Media Summary

Opponents, largely from the Democratic Party, criticized H.Res. 1142 for potentially bypassing thorough debate and scrutiny of the Senate's amendments to the appropriations bill. They expressed concerns that the expedited process might overlook critical issues within the funding provisions and limit transparency in the legislative process.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
0/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Congress

The bill H.Res. 1142, sponsored by Michelle Fischbach, does not appear to present any direct conflicts of interest based on the campaign finance data available. The bill's subject matter does not overlap with the industries that are major contributors to Fischbach's campaign. Therefore, there is no evidence to suggest that the bill is influenced by the financial interests of the sponsor's donors. It's important for voters to know that the absence of direct industry overlap does not necessarily mean there are no conflicts of interest, but in this case, there is no clear money trail that suggests a conflict. Further monitoring of the bill and the sponsor's actions would be necessary to identify any potential indirect conflicts of interest.

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us
Congressional Votes
On Ordering the Previous Question
House · Mar 27, 2026
Passed
209
YEA
206
NAY
17
NOT VOTING
On the Resolution
House · Mar 27, 2026
Passed
213
YEA
203
NAY
16
NOT VOTING

Source: GovTrack.us roll call vote data.