H.Res. 1245

H.Res. 1245: Recognizing the importance of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program to protect the United States’ scientific integrity, public health, environment, and economic growth.

Introduced Luz Rivas (D) HOUSE_RESOLUTION — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

H.Res. 1245 is a resolution that acknowledges the significance of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. The resolution emphasizes that this program is essential for maintaining scientific integrity, protecting public health, safeguarding the environment, and promoting economic growth in the United States. It likely calls for continued support and funding for the program to ensure its effectiveness.

Positive Media Summary

Media outlets that support environmental protection have praised H.Res. 1245 for its recognition of the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. They highlight that the resolution underscores the importance of transparency in greenhouse gas emissions reporting, which is crucial for informed public policy and climate action. Supporters argue that it will help bolster scientific research and public awareness regarding climate change.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of H.Res. 1245 have expressed concerns that the resolution may be used to justify increased regulations on businesses, potentially hindering economic growth. Some media outlets argue that the emphasis on greenhouse gas reporting might lead to excessive governmental oversight and could be seen as a move towards more stringent environmental policies that could impact job creation in certain industries.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Environmental Protection

The analysis of H.Res. 1245 reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Luz Rivas's top donor industries and the bill's focus on the Greenhouse Gas Reporting Program. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the disclosed contributions from Amgen Inc. ($5,000) and Grand Pharmaceutical Group Ltd. ($90,000) do not directly correlate with the environmental focus of the bill. The majority of lobbying activities are undisclosed, making it challenging to ascertain their influence. However, the absence of direct financial ties to the bill's subject matter suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while some lobbying exists, it does not appear to directly impact the integrity of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
GRAND PHARMACEUTICAL GROUP LTD (FKA EAST OCEAN MEDICAL (HONG KONG) LIMITED) CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $90,000
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ELK FOUNDATION DOUBLE HAUL STRATEGIES LLC $9,000
AMGEN INC. WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP $5,000
FUEL ETHANOL DISRUPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER INCORPATED MR. AMIR GOULART SCHARIF undisclosed
FUEL ETHANOL DISRUPTIVE BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH CENTER INCORPATED MR. AMIR GOULART SCHARIF undisclosed
BLACKSTONE CONSTRUCTION LLC WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP undisclosed
DENALI WATER SOLUTIONS WASHINGTON ADVOCACY GROUP undisclosed
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYER ORGANIZATIONS (NAPEO) ARENTFOX SCHIFF LLP undisclosed
RROMA COUNCIL RROMA COUNCIL undisclosed
BAJO COHEN AGLIANO, P.A. ON BEHALF OF HEALTH EDGE INVESTMENT PARTNERS, LLC BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
ERUDIO BIO, INC. BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
THE LOUIS D. BRANDEIS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER LAW THE LOUIS D. BRANDEIS CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS UNDER LAW undisclosed
CELLIGENCE LLC BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
PENN ENTERTAINMENT, INC. BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
COMMUNITY BANK ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC COMMUNITY BANK ADVISORY SERVICES, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Luz Rivas, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us