S. 1759

S. 1759: Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act

Reported by Committee Ted Budd (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act allows civil aircraft to fly faster than the speed of sound (Mach 1) over land in the U.S., as long as they do not create a sonic boom that reaches the ground. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is required to update its regulations to make this possible without needing special permission.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of the Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act argue that this legislation could lead to advancements in aviation technology and economic growth, as it opens the door for new supersonic aircraft that can shorten travel times. Many in the aviation industry have praised the bill for promoting innovation and enhancing U.S. competitiveness in the global market.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of the Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act express concerns about the potential environmental impact and noise pollution associated with supersonic flights. There are fears that allowing supersonic travel over land could disrupt communities and wildlife, and some environmental groups have voiced opposition, arguing that the bill prioritizes speed over sustainability.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$315,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Transportation and Public Works

The Supersonic Aviation Modernization Act, sponsored by Ted Budd, does not show any direct industry overlaps with the sponsor's top donor industries, which are primarily in health professionals and retired individuals. The total contributions from these sectors amount to $315 million, but they do not have a clear connection to aviation or the specific subject matter of this bill. The lobbying activity related to this bill includes various organizations, but none appear to directly connect to Budd's top donor industries. This lack of overlap suggests that there is minimal risk of conflicts of interest arising from the sponsor's financial backers. Voters should be aware that while the financial landscape is significant, the absence of direct ties to the aviation sector indicates a lower likelihood of undue influence from donors on this legislation.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $410,042
SAILDRONE INC. SAILDRONE INC. $377,725
OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA INC OUTDOOR ADVERTISING ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA, INC. $158,589
INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL LONGSHOREMEN'S ASSOCIATION $150,000
SBIR CONSORTIUM JOHN WILLIAMS $30,000
ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND BOUNDARY STONE PARTNERS $30,000
SEEING MACHINES GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
SAFE KIDS WORLDWIDE GRIFFIN STRATEGIES, LLC $30,000
CREATIVE ASSOCIATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC $30,000
MIDDLE EAST FORUM MIDDLE EAST FORUM $20,000
ATA ACTION RS GROUP CONSULTING LLC $6,000
END SEPSIS CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
TECHNEST SOLUTIONS S.L.A. DBA FORTRIS ON BEHALF OF NEXUSONE CONSULTING CURRENTSTRATEGIC LLC undisclosed
SBCC EQUIPMENT DEFENDING OUR COUNTRY, LLC undisclosed
BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION SUMMIT HEALTH CARE CONSULTING undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Ted Budd, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $240,000,000
Individuals: $240,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $75,000,000
Individuals: $75,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us