S. 4545

S. 4545: A bill to amend the America COMPETES Act to establish certain scientific integrity policies for Federal agencies that fund, conduct, or oversee scientific research, and for other purposes.

Introduced Brian Schatz (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4545 aims to amend the America COMPETES Act by establishing scientific integrity policies for federal agencies involved in funding, conducting, or overseeing scientific research. The bill seeks to ensure that scientific research is conducted transparently and free from political influence, thereby promoting trust in scientific findings and methodologies.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4545 have praised the bill for reinforcing the importance of scientific integrity in federal research. They argue that establishing clear policies will help safeguard research from political interference, ultimately leading to more reliable and credible scientific outcomes that can inform public policy and decision-making.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4545 express concerns that the bill may impose unnecessary regulations on federal agencies, potentially slowing down the research process. Some argue that the focus on scientific integrity could be used to stifle dissenting scientific opinions or research that contradicts prevailing political narratives, raising fears about academic freedom.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Science, Technology, Communications

The analysis of bill S. 4545, which aims to amend the America COMPETES Act regarding scientific integrity policies, shows no direct industry overlaps with the top donor industries of sponsor Brian Schatz. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes various organizations, but the lack of disclosed financial contributions from these entities to the sponsor suggests minimal direct influence. The only notable lobbying activity is from the National Electrical Contractors Association, which has contributed $600,000, but this does not directly relate to the scientific integrity policies outlined in the bill. Overall, the absence of overlapping interests and the limited financial ties indicate a low risk of conflict of interest for voters to consider.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION, INC. $600,000
BSA, THE SOFTWARE ALLIANCE TIM YEHL, LLC $20,000
ENVISION GROUP LLC MR. ANDREW FUTEY undisclosed
GESCONTI GROUP,INC. GESCONTI GROUP,INC. undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN FINANCIAL SERVICES ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
KASICH COMPANY MARKQUEST undisclosed
AMERICAN LOGISTICS ASSOCIATION MARKQUEST undisclosed
MARKQUEST MARKQUEST undisclosed
TRACKONOMY SYSTEMS, INC. ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
HOLLY STRATEGIES INC. ON BEHALF OF 202 GROUP ANCHOR & ARROW LLC undisclosed
CITY OF ST LOUIS BRACY TUCKER BROWN & VALANZANO DBA BROWN & ASSOCIATES undisclosed
EMAD EL SAID YOUSSEF SAAD EL-GALADA THROUGH BOLT CAPITAL, LP NEXUSONE CONSULTING undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Brian Schatz, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $760,000,000
Individuals: $760,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $237,500,000
Individuals: $237,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us