S. 4646

S. 4646: A bill to reinstate criminal penalties for persons charging veterans unauthorized fees relating to claims for benefits under the laws administered by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes.

Introduced Richard Blumenthal (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4646 is a bill that aims to reinstate criminal penalties for individuals who charge veterans unauthorized fees for assistance with their claims for benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs. The legislation seeks to protect veterans from potential exploitation by ensuring that only authorized and legitimate sources can assist them in navigating the benefits system.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4646 have praised the bill as a necessary step to protect veterans from fraud and abuse. They emphasize that reinstating criminal penalties will deter unscrupulous individuals from taking advantage of veterans, ensuring that those who have served the country receive the benefits they deserve without incurring unnecessary costs.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4646 argue that the bill may create additional barriers for veterans seeking assistance with their claims. Some media outlets have raised concerns that the reinstatement of criminal penalties could deter legitimate organizations from helping veterans, potentially leading to confusion and fewer resources available for those in need.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of bill S. 4646, which aims to reinstate criminal penalties for unauthorized fees charged to veterans, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Richard Blumenthal's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. The top donor industries do not appear to have a vested interest in veterans' benefits or related legal matters. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, such as contributions from American Laboratories Pharma, LLC ($45,000) and TotalEnergies EP Mozambique Area 1 ($170,000), these entities do not directly relate to the enforcement of veterans' benefit claims. Therefore, the risk of conflict of interest is assessed as low, as the financial contributions do not indicate a potential for undue influence on the legislation concerning veterans' rights.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
TOTALENERGIES EP MOZAMBIQUE AREA 1 BALLARD PARTNERS $170,000
AMERICAN LABORATORIES PHARMA, LLC FIRST PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES, LLC $45,000
SEXTONS CREEK ON BEHALF OF INDIANA WESLEYAN UNIVERSITY FIRST PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
YC CONSULTING LLC ON BEHALF OF KOREAN INTERNATIONAL TRADE ASSOCIATION FIRST PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
OLD NORTH STRATEGIES, LLC ON BEHALF OF EXELA PHARMA SCIENCES, LLC FIRST PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
THE CLAPHAM GROUP, LLC ON BEHALF OF CHILDREN'S EQUITY FUND FIRST PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
VALIDAS, LLC FIRST PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL JEWISH ADVOCACY CENTER ACTION FIRST PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
THE HARRIS FIRM, PLLC ON BEHALF OF FORGOTTEN GM BAILOUT VICTIMS FIRST PRINCIPLES STRATEGIES, LLC undisclosed
HEALTH SUPPLY US FARRAGUT PARTNERS LLP undisclosed
ARNOLD & PORTER SCHOLER KAYE LLP ON BEHALF OF NORC AT THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MCGINLEY LLC undisclosed
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. MCGINLEY LLC undisclosed
CONCORD PARTNERS LLC BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
23ANDME RESEARCH INSTITUTE BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed
ASIMAT AL HADHARAT BALLARD PARTNERS undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Richard Blumenthal, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $1,080,000,000
Individuals: $1,080,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $337,500,000
Individuals: $337,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us