S. 4654

S. 4654: A bill to amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to expand agricultural market access, and for other purposes.

Introduced Adam Schiff (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

The Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 was established to strengthen the U.S. economy by increasing sales of American agricultural products abroad. It directed the creation of trade offices worldwide to develop and expand international markets for U.S. farm commodities. ([en.wikipedia.org](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agricultural_Trade_Act_of_1978?utm_source=openai))

Positive Media Summary

The Act was praised for enhancing the global competitiveness of U.S. agriculture by facilitating market access and promoting export sales. It was seen as a significant step toward boosting the agricultural sector's contribution to the national economy.

Negative Media Summary

Critics argued that while the Act aimed to expand markets, it did not sufficiently address domestic agricultural challenges or provide adequate support to small-scale farmers. Some also expressed concerns about the effectiveness of the trade offices in achieving substantial market growth.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Foreign Trade and International Finance

The analysis of bill S. 4654, which aims to amend the Agricultural Trade Act of 1978 to expand agricultural market access, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the bill's subject matter and the top donor industries of sponsor Adam Schiff. The lobbying activity in this policy area includes significant contributions, such as $1,000,000 from the Friends Committee on National Legislation, but this organization does not appear to have a direct connection to agricultural trade. Other lobbying entities listed have undisclosed amounts, which complicates the transparency of their influence. Overall, the lack of direct financial ties between the sponsor's donors and the bill suggests a low risk of conflict of interest.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION FRIENDS COMMITTEE ON NATIONAL LEGISLATION $1,000,000
CEDIA CEDIA $120,000
HEARTFLOW, INC. HEARTFLOW, INC. $90,000
KNOA PHARMA LLC MERCURY PUBLIC AFFAIRS, LLC undisclosed
HELIX DEFENSE CROSS POTOMAC CONSULTING LLC undisclosed
SUR HOLDINGS BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GLOBAL KRATOM COALITION BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP ON BEHALF OF CURATIVE INC. BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
ORCA BIO BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
IONQ, INC. IONQ, INC. undisclosed
LIFE360 EMERGENT STRATEGIES undisclosed
ZILLOW BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS undisclosed
TWENTY TECHNOLOGIES, INC. THE COMPLETE AGENCY undisclosed
CULTURAL CARE INC. KEEFE STRATEGIES LLC FKA KEEFE SINGISER PARTNERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FORENSIC NURSES POLSINELLI PC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Adam Schiff, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us