S. 4656

S. 4656: A bill to provide for secure and accountable use of artificial intelligence by the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.

Introduced Kirsten Gillibrand (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4656 aims to establish guidelines for the Department of Defense (DoD) regarding the secure and responsible use of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies. The bill likely includes provisions for accountability, oversight, and ethical considerations in the deployment of AI systems within the military context.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4656 have praised the bill for promoting the safe and ethical integration of AI in defense operations. They argue that it will enhance national security while ensuring that AI technologies are used responsibly, addressing concerns about potential misuse and ethical implications.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4656 have raised concerns that the bill may not go far enough in regulating AI use within the military. Some argue that it could lead to a lack of transparency and accountability in AI decision-making processes, potentially resulting in unintended consequences during military operations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$945,000,000
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of bill S. 4656, which focuses on the secure and accountable use of artificial intelligence by the Department of Defense, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Kirsten Gillibrand's top donor industries. Her primary donor industries include Health Professionals, contributing $720 million, and Retired individuals, contributing $225 million. Since neither of these sectors has a direct stake in defense technology or artificial intelligence, the potential for conflicts of interest appears minimal. The lobbying activity in this area is diverse, with various entities involved, but none are directly linked to Gillibrand's major donors, further reducing the risk of conflict. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not intersect with the financial interests of the sponsor's top contributors.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SYNGENTA CORPORATION CHECKMATE GOVERNMENT RELATIONS $140,000
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPRO NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPROFITS (FORMERLY KNOWN AS THE NATIONAL COUNCIL OF NONPRO $85,660
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES TORRES CONSULTING, LLC $20,000
CURIO CURIO $10,000
WILLOW LABORATORIES WILLOW LABORATORIES undisclosed
ECONOINVEST HOLDING LLC CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
FIELD TECH INTERNATIONAL CORP CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
SYNCHRON, INC. KING & SPALDING LLP undisclosed
GIFT-IN-KIND MARKETPLACE MICHAEL BEST STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed
BROADBAND CONNECT B ARCHETYPE undisclosed
STELLAR DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION STELLAR DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION undisclosed
FONTAINEBLEAU DEVELOPMENT CORCORAN & ASSOCIATES, INC. DBA CORCORAN PARTNERS undisclosed
CITY OF EL PASO FORWARD GLOBAL undisclosed
FOREST RIVER BUS, LLC CFM STRATEGIC COMMUNICATIONS (CONKLING FISKUM & MCCORMICK) undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL MINERALS CARLSBAD, LLC VALIANT STRATEGIES LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Kirsten Gillibrand, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $720,000,000
Individuals: $720,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $225,000,000
Individuals: $225,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us