S. 4674

S. 4674: A bill to direct the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration to establish a Red Tape Hotline to receive notifications of burdensome agency rules, and for other purposes.

Introduced Rick Scott (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4674 is a bill that aims to create a Red Tape Hotline under the Small Business Administration (SBA). This hotline will allow small businesses to report and discuss rules and regulations they find burdensome, helping the SBA identify and address regulatory obstacles that may hinder small business operations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4674 highlight the bill as a proactive measure to empower small businesses by providing them with a direct line to voice their concerns about excessive regulations. Media coverage has praised the initiative for its potential to streamline processes and reduce unnecessary bureaucratic hurdles, which could foster a more favorable environment for small business growth.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4674 argue that the establishment of a Red Tape Hotline may not effectively solve the underlying issues of regulatory burdens and could lead to an influx of complaints that overwhelm the SBA. Some media outlets have expressed skepticism about the bill's potential impact, suggesting it may simply serve as a symbolic gesture rather than a meaningful solution to regulatory challenges faced by small businesses.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Commerce

The analysis of bill S. 4674, which aims to establish a Red Tape Hotline for the Small Business Administration, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Rick Scott's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. While there is lobbying activity in the policy area, the contributions from entities like Summit Works USA ($20,000) and Monroe Energy, LLC ($10,000) do not indicate a direct financial interest in the establishment of a hotline for reporting burdensome agency rules. The lack of disclosed amounts from several lobbying entities further complicates the assessment but does not inherently suggest a conflict of interest. Voters should be aware that while there are lobbyists involved, the absence of direct financial ties to the bill's objectives suggests a lower risk of conflict.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
SUMMIT WORKS USA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Rick Scott, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $40,000,000
Individuals: $40,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $12,500,000
Individuals: $12,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us