S. 4682

S. 4682: A bill to establish requirements for human judgment in the use of force by autonomous weapon systems used by the Department of Defense, and for other purposes.

Introduced Mark Kelly (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4682 is a bill that aims to set standards requiring human oversight in the decision-making process for the use of force by autonomous weapon systems operated by the Department of Defense. The legislation seeks to ensure that human judgment plays a critical role in situations where these advanced technologies are deployed, particularly in military operations.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4682 argue that the bill is a crucial step towards ensuring ethical standards in the deployment of military technology. They emphasize that human oversight can prevent potential abuses and unintended consequences of autonomous weapons, thereby promoting accountability in defense operations.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4682 express concerns that the bill may hinder military innovation and operational efficiency. Some argue that imposing strict human judgment requirements could slow down response times in critical situations, potentially endangering troops and national security. Additionally, there are worries that the bill might not go far enough in regulating the development and use of autonomous weapon systems.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Armed Forces and National Security

The analysis of bill S. 4682, which focuses on establishing requirements for human judgment in the use of force by autonomous weapon systems, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Mark Kelly's top donor industries. The lobbying activity in this policy area shows contributions from various organizations, but none appear to directly influence the bill's subject matter. The largest lobbying contribution comes from Sasol Chemicals USA LLC, which contributed $260,000, but their business is not directly related to autonomous weapon systems. Overall, the lack of direct financial ties between the bill's focus and the sponsor's donors suggests a low risk of conflicts of interest. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, it does not seem to directly impact the legislation at hand.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC SASOL CHEMICALS USA LLC $260,000
ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE COUNCIL FKA MASTER LIMITED PARTNERSHIP ASSOCIATION ZIEBART CONSULTING, LLC $60,000
ORGANIC PRODUCE ASSOCIATION THE RUSSELL GROUP, INC. $50,000
GRAVITICS TECHNOLOGY STRATEGIES LLC $30,000
LIVINGSTON INTERNATIONAL INC VENABLE LLP $30,000
CITY OF WILLISTON (ND) NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $30,000
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF POSTAL SUPERVISORS $28,000
S&P GLOBAL F/K/A IHS MARITIME & TRADE VENABLE LLP $20,000
TOWN OF TUSAYAN NEXXUS CONSULTING, LLC $10,000
TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE TREA SENIOR CITIZENS LEAGUE $5,000
NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS NATIONAL RELIGIOUS BROADCASTERS undisclosed
INTERNATIONAL REGISTRIES, INC. VENABLE LLP undisclosed
ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC ARISTEIA STRATEGIC ADVISORS, LLC undisclosed
US CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGIES ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed
CX2 ATS COMMUNICATIONS, INC. (DBA SILBEY STRATEGIES) undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Mark Kelly, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us