S. 4684

S. 4684: A bill to amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 to set a compulsory funding floor for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, and for other purposes.

Introduced Elizabeth Warren (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4684 proposes to amend the Consumer Financial Protection Act of 2010 by establishing a mandatory minimum funding level for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. This means that the Bureau would be guaranteed a certain amount of funding each year to ensure it can effectively carry out its mission of protecting consumers in the financial sector.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4684 argue that setting a compulsory funding floor for the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection is essential for maintaining strong consumer protections and ensuring that the Bureau has the necessary resources to combat unfair financial practices. Advocates believe this legislation will enhance the Bureau's ability to serve consumers and hold financial institutions accountable.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4684 express concerns that establishing a compulsory funding floor may lead to increased government spending and could limit the Bureau's flexibility in responding to changing financial landscapes. Some opponents argue that this could entrench the Bureau's operations without accountability, potentially leading to inefficiencies and a lack of responsiveness to consumer needs.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Finance and Financial Sector

While there are no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Elizabeth Warren's top donors and the subject matter of Bill S. 4684, there is notable lobbying activity in the policy area related to consumer financial protection. Several entities, such as SUMMIT WORKS USA and MONROE ENERGY, LLC, have engaged in lobbying efforts, contributing a total of $40,000 through OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC. This indicates a level of interest in the outcomes of this bill, although the specific motivations of these donors are not disclosed. The lack of direct industry connections reduces the potential for conflicts of interest, but the lobbying presence suggests that stakeholders may have vested interests in the bill's provisions.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
SUMMIT WORKS USA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Elizabeth Warren, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us