S. 4702

S. 4702: A bill to amend the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to counter subsidies provided by the Government of the People’s Republic of China, to protect critical United States industries, and to strengthen United States economic and national security co

Introduced Ruben Gallego (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4702 aims to amend the Export-Import Bank Act of 1945 to address and counteract subsidies given by the Government of China. The bill seeks to protect vital U.S. industries and enhance both the economic and national security of the United States by ensuring fair competition in international trade.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4702 have praised the bill for taking a strong stance against unfair trade practices by China. They argue that it is a necessary step to safeguard American jobs and industries, reinforcing the U.S. commitment to fair competition in the global market while enhancing national security.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4702 have expressed concerns that the bill may escalate trade tensions with China and lead to retaliatory measures. Some argue that it could negatively impact U.S. businesses that rely on trade with China, potentially harming economic relationships and increasing costs for consumers.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Foreign Trade and International Finance

The analysis of bill S. 4702, which aims to amend the Export-Import Bank Act to counter subsidies from China, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Ruben Gallego's top donor industries. The lobbying activity associated with this bill includes various organizations, but none appear to have a direct financial interest that conflicts with the bill's objectives. For instance, Monroe Energy, LLC and Upstate Niagara Cooperative, Inc. each contributed $10,000, but their interests do not directly relate to the export-import banking or national security sectors. Overall, the absence of significant donor overlap suggests a low risk of conflict of interest in this case.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
AMERICAN SUBCONTRACTOR ASSOCIATION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $30,000
AMERICAN COUNCIL OF INDEPENDENT LABORATORIES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $20,000
FINISHING TRADES INSTITUTE OF THE MID ATLANTIC REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $15,000
STEAMFITTERS LOCAL 420 OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $12,000
MONROE ENERGY, LLC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
UPSTATE NIAGARA COOPERATIVE, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
AGRI-MARK, INC OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $10,000
FRIENDS OF FATHER JUDGE HIGH SCHOOL, INC. OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC $6,000
ARSENAL ASSOCIATES OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
LABOR & ENERGY ALLIANCE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS MIDDLE TENNESSEE OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS INDEPENDENCE REGION OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
EKLUTNA, INC EKLUTNA, INC. undisclosed
CARPENTERS' COMPANY OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed
NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION - PENN-DEL-JERSEY CHAPTER OSCAR POLICY GROUP, LLC undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Ruben Gallego, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $120,000,000
Individuals: $120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $37,500,000
Individuals: $37,500,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us