S. 4759

S. 4759: A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to authorize de novo review of innocent spouse relief by the Tax Court and other courts.

Introduced Margaret Hassan (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4759 is a bill that seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code to allow the Tax Court and other courts to conduct a fresh or 'de novo' review of cases involving innocent spouse relief. This means that if a spouse seeks relief from tax liabilities due to their partner's actions, the courts would be able to review the case without being bound by previous decisions made by the IRS.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4759 argue that the bill enhances fairness in the tax system by providing individuals with the opportunity to have their cases heard anew in court. This could lead to more equitable outcomes for those who were unaware of tax issues caused by their spouses, thus promoting justice and accountability.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4759 express concerns that allowing de novo reviews could overwhelm the court system with additional cases, potentially leading to delays and increased costs for taxpayers. There are also worries that this could undermine the IRS's authority and complicate the resolution of tax disputes.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of bill S. 4759, which aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code regarding innocent spouse relief, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor, Margaret Hassan's top donor industries and the subject matter of the bill. This indicates a low likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from donor influence. The lobbying activity in this policy area involves various firms, but the lack of disclosed amounts and specific connections to the bill's provisions further diminishes the risk of conflicts. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the absence of direct financial ties to the bill's content suggests that the sponsor's motivations may not be influenced by donor interests in this instance.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE INC DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE, INC. $10,000
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Margaret Hassan, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $480,000,000
Individuals: $480,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $150,000,000
Individuals: $150,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us