S. 4761

S. 4761: A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to clarify the authority of the Tax Court to order relief from a judgment or order.

Introduced Tim Scott (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4761 is a bill that seeks to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. Its primary purpose is to clarify the Tax Court's authority to grant relief from judgments or orders it has issued. This could mean that the Tax Court would have clearer guidelines on how it can reverse or modify its decisions in certain circumstances.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4761 argue that the bill enhances judicial flexibility and fairness within the Tax Court system. By clarifying the court's authority, it could lead to more just outcomes for taxpayers who find themselves in difficult situations due to previous rulings.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4761 express concerns that the bill may undermine the finality of Tax Court decisions, potentially opening the door for excessive appeals and prolonging tax disputes. Some worry that this could lead to increased uncertainty in the tax system and could be exploited by individuals seeking to evade their tax obligations.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
2/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

The analysis of Bill S. 4761, which aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code regarding the Tax Court's authority, reveals no direct industry overlaps between the sponsor Tim Scott's top donor industries and the bill's subject matter. The absence of overlapping industries suggests a low likelihood of conflicts of interest arising from campaign contributions related to this legislation. Furthermore, while there is lobbying activity from various companies in the tax policy area, the lack of disclosed financial contributions from these entities to the sponsor minimizes potential influence. Voters should be aware that while lobbying exists, the direct financial ties to the sponsor are not evident, indicating a lower risk of conflict.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
MANAGED FUNDS ASSOCIATION RMP STRATEGIES, LLC $10,000
DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE INC DISABILITY RIGHTS EDUCATION & DEFENSE, INC. $10,000
SAMSARA INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
OTG PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
BLOCKQUAKE HOLDINGS LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PAYSAFE MERCHANT SERVICES CORPORATION PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
PROOF OF STAKE ALLIANCE PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
INTEGRAL COMMUNITIES PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SENTILINK CORP. PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
TEMPLUM LLC (FORMERLY KNOWN AS OUISA CAPITAL LLC) PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
GLOBAL PRIMEX LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
WARRIOR TRADING PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SYNIVERSE TECHNOLOGIES LLC PAUL HASTINGS LLP undisclosed
SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH SOUTHERN INSTITUTE OF POLICY RESEARCH undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Tim Scott, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $1,120,000,000
Individuals: $1,120,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $350,000,000
Individuals: $350,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us