S. 4778

S. 4778: A bill to authorize the Secretary of Education to award grants to create evidence-based student success programs designed to increase participation, retention, and completion rates of high-need students.

Introduced Martin Heinrich (D) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4778 is a bill that seeks to empower the Secretary of Education to provide grants for developing programs aimed at improving the success of high-need students in education. These programs will focus on increasing participation in educational opportunities, helping students stay enrolled, and ensuring they complete their studies.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4778 have praised the bill for its focus on high-need students, emphasizing that it addresses educational disparities and promotes equity. Media coverage highlights the potential for these grants to foster innovative and evidence-based approaches to student success, which could lead to higher graduation rates and better educational outcomes.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4778 have raised concerns about the allocation of funds, questioning whether the grants will be effectively managed and whether they will truly address the root causes of low participation and completion rates among high-need students. Some media outlets have pointed out that without clear guidelines and accountability measures, the bill could lead to ineffective programs and wasted resources.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Education

The analysis of Bill S. 4778, which aims to enhance student success programs for high-need students, reveals no direct industry overlaps with the sponsor Martin Heinrich's top donor industries. While there is significant lobbying activity from various organizations, the lack of direct financial ties between these entities and the bill's subject matter suggests a low risk of conflict of interest. Notably, the largest contributions come from the Spray Foam Coalition ($60,000) and Shanda Asset Management LLC ($50,000), neither of which have a clear connection to education or student success initiatives. This indicates that while lobbying is present, it does not directly influence the legislative intent of the bill.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
SPRAY FOAM COALITION SPRAY FOAM COALITION $60,000
SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC SHANDA ASSET MANAGEMENT LLC $50,000
GREEN OCEANS EDNEXUS ADVISORS, LLC $22,500
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION JOHN BRIAN LEDBETTER MISSIONS CORPORATION undisclosed
LG ELECTRONICS USA, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP undisclosed
RIDE GROUP LLC AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD undisclosed
CRESCENTA VALLEY WATER DISTRICT CAPITOL CORE GROUP, INC. undisclosed
ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING LIMITED SIDLEY AUSTIN LLP undisclosed
SPACECONNECT ASSOCIATION SALT POINT STRATEGIES undisclosed
CURIUM US LLC CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
TWINZA OIL LIMITED ANCHOR GROUP LLC undisclosed
PUBLIC PRIVATE STRATEGIES VALENTINE STRATEGIES undisclosed
PELICAN ENERGY PARTNERS LP CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed
CORVUS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC. CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS, INC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Martin Heinrich, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $880,000,000
Individuals: $880,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $275,000,000
Individuals: $275,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us