S. 4780

S. 4780: A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to exclude micro-grants for food security from gross income.

Introduced Lisa Murkowski (R) SENATE_BILL — 119th Congress
Plain English Summary

S. 4780 is a bill that aims to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 by excluding micro-grants specifically provided for food security from being counted as gross income. This means that individuals or organizations receiving these micro-grants would not have to report them as taxable income, potentially encouraging more participation in food security programs.

Positive Media Summary

Supporters of S. 4780 have praised the bill as a crucial step toward enhancing food security for vulnerable populations. They argue that by excluding micro-grants from gross income, the legislation will incentivize more donations and funding for food assistance programs, ultimately helping to alleviate hunger in communities across the nation.

Negative Media Summary

Critics of S. 4780 have expressed concerns that the bill could lead to a loss of tax revenue, which might impact funding for other essential services. Some opponents have also raised questions about the effectiveness of micro-grants and whether they truly address the root causes of food insecurity, suggesting that the focus should be on more comprehensive solutions.

Conflict of Interest Analysis Deep Analysis
3/10
Risk Level
Low
Total Donations
$0
PAC Percentage
0%
Policy Area
Taxation

While there are no direct industry overlaps detected between the bill's subject matter of food security micro-grants and the sponsor's top donor industries, there is notable lobbying activity in related areas. For instance, Northrop Grumman, which contributed $60,000, is primarily involved in defense and aerospace, and its interests may not align directly with food security initiatives. Additionally, other contributors like Viasat, Inc. ($80,000) and Kalogon, Inc. ($30,000) are also outside the food security realm. However, the lack of direct financial ties to the food security sector suggests that the risk of conflict is moderate rather than high. Voters should be aware that while the bill aims to support food security, the financial interests of some lobbyists may not prioritize this issue.

Lobbying Activity — Who's Pushing?

Organizations that lobbied on issues related to this bill's policy area.

Client Lobbying Firm Amount
VERISIGN, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $90,000
VIASAT, INC. HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP $80,000
NORTHROP GRUMMAN SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $60,000
NEXT GLOBAL CAPITAL, INC. OBO WHITEFOX DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $60,000
KALOGON, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
THE ALLIANCE FOR SECURE AI ACTION SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
STREET SMARTS VR SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
NATILUS SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
MORAN GLOBAL STRATEGIES, INC. OBO PRIETO BATTERY, INC. SKYLINE CAPITOL LLC $30,000
SACHEM, INC. RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $30,000
PLUG POWER RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $20,000
SLEVIN ADVISORY LLC O/B/O THE IFP ACTION RIDGE PATH STRATEGIES $10,000
BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH (FORMERLY MERCY HEALTH) BON SECOURS MERCY HEALTH (FORMERLY MERCY HEALTH) undisclosed
SWIFT CURRENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INC. TRIAD STRATEGIES, LLC. undisclosed
PRECISION CUSTOM COMPONENTS, LLC TRIAD STRATEGIES, LLC. undisclosed

Source: Senate Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) filings, 2026

Sponsor's Top Donor Industries

Top industries funding Lisa Murkowski, ranked by total contributions.

Health Professionals $1,440,000,000
Individuals: $1,440,000,000 PACs: $0
Retired $450,000,000
Individuals: $450,000,000 PACs: $0

Source: OpenSecrets.org (Center for Responsive Politics)

TheBillRoom is free and independent. No ads, no subscriptions, no political funding. If this analysis was useful, reader support keeps it running.
Support Us